<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2012-10-31" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2489" />
  <endPage num="2589" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Riverland Sustainable Futures Fund</name>
      <text id="20121031e5d3aae1fdd94794b0000372">
        <heading>RIVERLAND SUSTAINABLE FUTURES FUND</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="599" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. J.S.L. DAWKINS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-10-31">
            <name>RIVERLAND SUSTAINABLE FUTURES FUND</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2012-10-31T14:37:00" />
        <text id="20121031e5d3aae1fdd94794b0000373">
          <timeStamp time="2012-10-31T14:37:00" />
          <by role="member" id="599">The Hon. J.S.L. DAWKINS (14:37): </by> By way of further supplementary question, will the minister indicate whether further applications will be sought?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Agriculture, Food and Fisheries, Minister for Forests, Minister for Regional Development, Minister for Tourism, Minister for the Status of Women</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-10-31">
            <name>RIVERLAND SUSTAINABLE FUTURES FUND</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2012-10-31T14:37:00" />
        <text id="20121031e5d3aae1fdd94794b0000374">
          <timeStamp time="2012-10-31T14:37:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO (Minister for Agriculture, Food and Fisheries, Minister for Forests, Minister for Regional Development, Minister for Tourism, Minister for the Status of Women) (14:37): </by> Again, I have made this very clear so I am disappointed; after saying that I believe he did listen to my previous answers, I have to take it back. I believe I may have misled parliament. He is not listening at all, because I have said in this place before very clearly (and it is there in <term>Hansard</term> and he can go back and check it) that, in relation to the outcome of this grant round, if all the funds were fully expended there would be no further calls for any further grant proposals.</text>
        <text id="20121031e5d3aae1fdd94794b0000375">If the funds were not fully expended after this process, then further rounds would be put out publicly. The other thing I have raised in this place before is that sometimes a proposal might be put forward and it might be agreed to, and then for some reason the recipient is not able to proceed with their grant and they might withdraw from that, and those moneys then become available back to the grant.</text>
        <text id="20121031e5d3aae1fdd94794b0000376">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="10">The Hon. J.S.L. Dawkins interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20121031e5d3aae1fdd94794b0000377">
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO: </by> This is not confusing; this is not rocket science. This is common sense, and any moneys that are not fully expended from this particular grant round will continue in the fund and another round will be made available for grant applications to be made. It is not rocket science—it is really d'oh head sort of stuff.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>