<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2012-10-18" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2393" />
  <endPage num="2425" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Tourism Commission</name>
      <text id="20121018e6984b12f2a24dcda0000077">
        <heading>TOURISM COMMISSION</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-10-18">
            <name>TOURISM COMMISSION</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2012-10-18T14:34:00" />
        <text id="20121018e6984b12f2a24dcda0000078">
          <timeStamp time="2012-10-18T14:34:00" />
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (14:34):</by>  I have a supplementary question arising out of the minister's answer. Mr President, given the minister is saying she has no knowledge as to whether the $300,000 is for a part-time position of 2½ days a week. Does she support—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3122">
        <name>The Hon. I.K. HUNTER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20121018e6984b12f2a24dcda0000079">
          <by role="member" id="3122">The Hon. I.K. HUNTER:</by>  Point of order, Mr President. This so-called supplementary in no way arises out of the original answer. It is actually a supplementary on a supplementary.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1822">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20121018e6984b12f2a24dcda0000080">
          <by role="member" id="1822">The PRESIDENT:</by>  Thank you for that. I have you on the call list, Hon. Mr Lucas.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20121018e6984b12f2a24dcda0000081">
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS:</by>  A supplementary question arising out of the original answer, Mr President.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1822">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20121018e6984b12f2a24dcda0000082">
          <by role="member" id="1822">The PRESIDENT:</by>  Okay, you will give it another go?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20121018e6984b12f2a24dcda0000083">
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS: </by> Does the minister support the payment of $300,000 for a 2½ day a week part-time position, if that is the decision of the Tourism Commission?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Agriculture, Food and Fisheries, Minister for Forests, Minister for Regional Development, Minister for Tourism, Minister for the Status of Women</electorate>
        <startTime time="2012-10-18T14:35:00" />
        <text id="20121018e6984b12f2a24dcda0000084">
          <timeStamp time="2012-10-18T14:35:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO (Minister for Agriculture, Food and Fisheries, Minister for Forests, Minister for Regional Development, Minister for Tourism, Minister for the Status of Women) (14:35): </by> These are matters for the board. My understanding is that that figure—and I do not have the details of this at all—would be the figure if a full-time position was to be selected. My understanding is (and again I am happy to check the detail) is that the position that is being advertised is not a full-time position. My understanding is that, if the position is a full-time position, that would be the pay associated with it, or part thereof.</text>
        <page num="2397" />
        <text id="20121018e6984b12f2a24dcda0000085">The thing that is important and underlying this is that the initial decisions around the change of the chief executive position were made at the time, based on savings that had to be made and on structural issues at the time as the organisation was too top heavy and needed flattening. There were a range of issues at the time and they were the reasons a decision was made to pay out the chief executive at the time and replace him. A review was then requested of the new chief executive, who was employed part-time on an interim basis. We were always committed to replacing the chief executive.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. Lucas</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20121018e6984b12f2a24dcda0000086">
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. Lucas: </by> Gail, cut your losses now. Just sit down—cut your losses. I won't ask you any more supplementaries.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20121018e6984b12f2a24dcda0000087">
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO: </by> The truth hurts. They do not like to listen to the truth.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1822">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20121018e6984b12f2a24dcda0000088">
          <by role="member" id="1822">The PRESIDENT:</by>  Don't worry about them: you're telling me.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20121018e6984b12f2a24dcda0000089">
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO: </by> This is some reality checking. At the time I said that the part-time position would be interim only and that it would be replaced somewhere by the end of the year, early next year, and that is exactly what we are doing. That position will be replaced. I have never said whether it would be replaced by a part-time position or a full-time position—ever. I just said at the time that it would be replaced. A review has been conducted by the chief executive, and that is still being discussed with me and has not been finalised.</text>
        <text id="20121018e6984b12f2a24dcda0000090">Those matters have been put in place, they are about to be completed and a decision will be made whether that position needs to be filled with a full-time or part-time position. I have never said that it will necessarily be replaced with a full-time position. Honourable members come into this place and make up things as they go along, and the very competent board will make a decision. It has hired a recruitment selection company and it will go through a process of selecting the most suitable person to fill the position.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1822">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20121018e6984b12f2a24dcda0000091">
          <by role="member" id="1822">The PRESIDENT:</by>  You have a question Mr Lucas?</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>