<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2012-10-17" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2345" />
  <endPage num="2395" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Local Government Code of Conduct</name>
      <text id="201210171cfb35177b644bfe80000194">
        <heading>LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE OF CONDUCT</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3164" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-10-17">
            <name>LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE OF CONDUCT</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2012-10-17T15:08:00" />
        <text id="201210171cfb35177b644bfe80000195">
          <timeStamp time="2012-10-17T15:08:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. WADE (15:08):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking the Minister for State/Local Government Relations questions in relation to the mandatory code of conduct for council members.</text>
        <text id="201210171cfb35177b644bfe80000196">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3164" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201210171cfb35177b644bfe80000197">
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. WADE:</by>  Earlier today, I asked the minister whether misuse of a taxpayer-funded mobile phone would be contrary to the draft mandatory code of conduct released yesterday. The minister said that whether it was contrary to the code would depend on the policies of the relevant council. The mandatory code draft reads, in relation to misuse of council resources, 3.14:</text>
        <text id="201210171cfb35177b644bfe80000198">
          <inserted>Council members are to ensure that Council resources are used effectively and prudently and solely in the public interest.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="201210171cfb35177b644bfe80000199">Clause 3.15 reads:</text>
        <text id="201210171cfb35177b644bfe80000200">
          <inserted>Council members are not to use Council resources, including services of Council staff, for private purposes, unless legally or properly authorised to do so, and payments are made where appropriate.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="201210171cfb35177b644bfe80000201">My questions are:</text>
        <page num="2357" />
        <text id="201210171cfb35177b644bfe80000202">1.&amp;#x9;Can the minister confirm his view that use of a ratepayer-funded mobile phone for political campaign purposes is solely in the public interest and is therefore consistent with clause 3.14?</text>
        <text id="201210171cfb35177b644bfe80000203">2.&amp;#x9;Can the minister confirm his view that use of a ratepayer-funded mobile phone for political campaign purposes can be authorised by councils, consistent with clause 3.15?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3125" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. R.P. WORTLEY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister for State/Local Government Relations</electorate>
        <startTime time="2012-10-17T15:09:00" />
        <text id="201210171cfb35177b644bfe80000204">
          <timeStamp time="2012-10-17T15:09:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3125">The Hon. R.P. WORTLEY (Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister for State/Local Government Relations) (15:09):</by>  This arose out of an attack on the Mayor of Prospect. I have been informed that the texts were from a private phone and were not paid for by the Prospect City Council. So, once again the sleaze from this opposition, the actual baseless allegations in an effort to slander a very well-respected mayor, are just outrageous. There was no basis to make that report. Rachel Sanderson, the MP for Adelaide, used her taxpayer-funded newsletter to endorse one particular Liberal candidate. Where was all that? Where was your concern about taxpayers' money then? You are a hypocrite. Opposition members are hypocrites, and that is as far as I am going to take this whole disgraceful exercise of the opposition.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>