<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2012-10-16" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2303" />
  <endPage num="2346" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Tour Down Under</name>
      <text id="201210161b4d50bd547f49d6b0000134">
        <heading>TOUR DOWN UNDER</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1820" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-10-16">
            <name>TOUR DOWN UNDER</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2012-10-16T15:01:00" />
        <page num="2309" />
        <text id="201210161b4d50bd547f49d6b0000135">
          <timeStamp time="2012-10-16T15:01:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1820">The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY (Leader of the Opposition) (15:01):</by>  A supplementary question, Mr President.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1822">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201210161b4d50bd547f49d6b0000136">
          <by role="member" id="1822">The PRESIDENT:</by>  A supplementary question, the Hon. Mr Ridgway, arising out of the answer.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1820">
        <name>The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201210161b4d50bd547f49d6b0000137">
          <by role="member" id="1820">The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY:</by>  Can the minister give us the figure—arising out of the non-answer.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1822">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201210161b4d50bd547f49d6b0000138">
          <by role="member" id="1822">The PRESIDENT:</by>  Order! If it is a non-answer, you can't have a supplementary.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1820">
        <name>The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201210161b4d50bd547f49d6b0000139">
          <by role="member" id="1820">The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY:</by>  It is arising out of the answer, Mr President. Please don't start off in a grumpy mood. Can the minister confirm, maybe not in dollar terms, that Mr Armstrong was provided with a house during his visit here? Did we provide food and wine in that house? Was his private jet fuelled and serviced using taxpayers' funds? What other expenses were paid by the taxpayer while he was here?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Agriculture</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Forests</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Regional Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Tourism</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Status of Women</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2012-10-16T15:01:00" />
        <text id="201210161b4d50bd547f49d6b0000140">
          <timeStamp time="2012-10-16T15:01:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO (Minister for Agriculture, Food and Fisheries, Minister for Forests, Minister for Regional Development, Minister for Tourism, Minister for the Status of Women) (15:01):</by>  I have answered the question, but I want to clarify something. I think I said 'economic return'. What I meant to say was '$42 million economic benefit to the state', just so that everyone is quite clear. In relation to the second part of the question, which I was distracted from answering, about demanding a refund, this matter is still being considered.</text>
        <text id="201210161b4d50bd547f49d6b0000141">There have been no final decisions or findings in relation to Lance Armstrong to date, so this matter is still under consideration. It is still being investigated and, when the outcome of those investigations is delivered, the state government will then consider its position in relation to a refund. I have already requested crown advice on the potential capacity for us to do that, so that is already being considered, and we will certainly consider our position once this matter has been finalised and a decision or findings in relation to Lance Armstrong have been delivered.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>