<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2012-09-04" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1909" />
  <endPage num="2012" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Answers to Questions</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Departmental Expenditure</name>
      <text id="2012090468e25f335b9b4622a0000134">
        <heading>DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURE</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2011-07-07" qonNum="233">
            <name>DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURE</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <page num="1917" />
        <text id="2012090468e25f335b9b4622a0000135">233 <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</by> (7 July 2011) (First Session).  Can the Minister for Environment and Conservation advise the actual level for 2010-11 of both capital and recurrent expenditure underspending (or overspending) for all departments and agencies (which were not classified in the general government sector) then reporting to the minister?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3122" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. I.K. HUNTER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Communities and Social Inclusion</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Social Housing</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Disabilities</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Youth</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Volunteers</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2011-07-07" qonNum="233">
            <name>DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURE</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="2012090468e25f335b9b4622a0000136">
          <by role="member" id="3122">The Hon. I.K. HUNTER (Minister for Communities and Social Inclusion, Minister for Social Housing, Minister for Disabilities, Minister for Youth, Minister for Volunteers):</by>  The Minister for Water and the River Murray has been advised:</text>
        <text id="2012090468e25f335b9b4622a0000137">SA Water's actual level of recurrent expenditure in 2010-11, including all operating expenditure, depreciation and borrowing costs but excluding income tax equivalent payments, was $897 million against an original budget of $1.021 billion, an underspend of $124 million.</text>
        <text id="2012090468e25f335b9b4622a0000138">The underspend was primarily due to the approved carryover of unused temporary water purchases ($54 million), a decrease in recoverable works expenditure offset by a reduction in income ($19 million), lower electricity usage and charges ($17 million) and a reduction in depreciation and borrowing costs ($29 million).</text>
        <text id="2012090468e25f335b9b4622a0000139">SA Water's actual level of capital expenditure for 2010-11 was $693 million against an original budget of $887 million, an underspend of $194 million, which is primarily due to:</text>
        <text id="2012090468e25f335b9b4622a0000140">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">Project spend deferred into outer years—Adelaide Desalination Project ($175 million), Christies Beach Wastewater Treatment Plant Upgrade ($15 million) and Adelaide Airport Stormwater Scheme ($5 million).</item>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="2012090468e25f335b9b4622a0000141">The above underspends were partially offset by:</text>
        <text id="2012090468e25f335b9b4622a0000142">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">the North-South Interconnection System Project expenditure brought forward $44 million; and</item>
        </text>
        <text id="2012090468e25f335b9b4622a0000143">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">the removal of Water Security Contingency, as this was not required to be utilised ($29 million).</item>
        </text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>