<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2012-07-18" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1753" />
  <endPage num="1822" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Salary Sacrificing</name>
      <text id="20120718a55a6cf64a4e4df4a0000107">
        <heading>SALARY SACRIFICING</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-07-18">
            <name>SALARY SACRIFICING</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2012-07-18T15:00:00" />
        <text id="20120718a55a6cf64a4e4df4a0000108">
          <timeStamp time="2012-07-18T15:00:00" />
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (15:00): </by> By way of supplementary question arising out of the answer, is the minister refusing to obtain information, if he does not know the answer to the question, in relation to whether the tender arrangements required, as most would, the company tendering to advise of those circumstances in an associated company and, if not, why not?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3125" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. R.P. WORTLEY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister for State/Local Government Relations</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-07-18">
            <name>SALARY SACRIFICING</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2012-07-18T15:01:00" />
        <text id="20120718a55a6cf64a4e4df4a0000109">
          <timeStamp time="2012-07-18T15:01:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3125">The Hon. R.P. WORTLEY (Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister for State/Local Government Relations) (15:01): </by> I just gave a response. It is not a matter of my refusing. The member will not take the response which I have given him. It is just a part of his sleazy innuendo, which he loves to progress.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>