<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2012-05-31" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1377" />
  <endPage num="1436" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Bills</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Mental Health (Inpatient) Amendment Bill</name>
      <text id="20120531ee590b549d33415a80000211">
        <heading>MENTAL HEALTH (INPATIENT) AMENDMENT BILL</heading>
      </text>
      <subproceeding>
        <name>Committee Stage</name>
        <text id="20120531ee590b549d33415a80000212">
          <heading>Committee Stage</heading>
        </text>
        <page num="1391" />
        <text id="20120531ee590b549d33415a80000213">In committee.</text>
        <text id="20120531ee590b549d33415a80000214">Clause 1.</text>
        <talker role="member" id="2742">
          <name>The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK</name>
          <house>Legislative Council</house>
          <text id="20120531ee590b549d33415a80000215">
            <by role="member" id="2742">The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK:</by>  The minister responsible, I understand, has agreed that we will try to soldier on. There has been a number of amendments to this bill, some of which were this week which makes them difficult to proceed with, particularly in our situation. The Liberal Party has a process that means these need to be considered on a Monday of a sitting week, so we will not be ready to deal with those. However, I have some questions which relate to some of the amendments and I would appreciate the opportunity to give the minister a chance to come back with some responses, as well.</text>
          <text id="20120531ee590b549d33415a80000216">In particular, in relation to the ECT provisions, to which the Hon. Ann Bressington has some amendments, my first question is about the circumstances in which ECT would be used for minors and whether that is, indeed, only in life-threatening situations. We would appreciate some comments from the minister in that regard.</text>
        </talker>
        <talker role="member" id="3125">
          <name>The Hon. R.P. WORTLEY</name>
          <house>Legislative Council</house>
          <text id="20120531ee590b549d33415a80000217">
            <by role="member" id="3125">The Hon. R.P. WORTLEY:</by>  We will be discussing the Hon. Ann Bressington's amendments in detail.</text>
        </talker>
        <talker role="member" id="2742">
          <name>The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK</name>
          <house>Legislative Council</house>
          <text id="20120531ee590b549d33415a80000218">
            <by role="member" id="2742">The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK:</by>  So you just want me to put these on the record?</text>
        </talker>
        <talker role="member" id="3125">
          <name>The Hon. R.P. WORTLEY</name>
          <house>Legislative Council</house>
          <text id="20120531ee590b549d33415a80000219">
            <by role="member" id="3125">The Hon. R.P. WORTLEY:</by>  Yes, just put them on the record and we will address them.</text>
        </talker>
        <talker role="member" id="2742">
          <name>The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK</name>
          <house>Legislative Council</house>
          <text id="20120531ee590b549d33415a80000220">
            <by role="member" id="2742">The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK: </by> In relation to the context of what those life threatening situations would be, the opposition has considerable sympathy for the amendments put forward by the Hon. Ann Bressington. We think that the provision for minors, particularly against the will of their parents, should only be used as an absolute last resort.</text>
          <text id="20120531ee590b549d33415a80000221">In relation to ECT provisions generally for minors, whether two opinions are required or how the approval for treatment given, my third question is: how many times ECT has been used on minors under the age of 16 years. I understand the government keeps some sort of data on that, so if we could be provided with that, that would be appreciated.</text>
          <text id="20120531ee590b549d33415a80000222">In relation to the Hon. Tammy Franks' amendments, I suspect that when she moves those the government will make considerable comments. The Hon. Rob Brokenshire has some amendments relating to the community visitors scheme, which is something proudly the Liberal Party had inserted into the Mental Health Act in 2009. I understand that his amendment seeks to shift the community visitors scheme from the Mental Health Act to the Guardianship Act, I think.</text>
          <text id="20120531ee590b549d33415a80000223">To clarify and provide some information on that, we would appreciate having an update on the community visitors scheme. I understand that Mr Maurice Corcoran, who has been a very fine advocate in the disability field; and, from memory, when I worked for the minister for disability services, he was an advocate for community visitor schemes generally. I am pleased to see that he has been appointed as the coordinator.</text>
          <text id="20120531ee590b549d33415a80000224">I would appreciate an update on how the scheme is going, how many volunteers have been appointed, whether there are any reports available from the establishment, albeit some time after the act was proclaimed and passed. How many visits have taken place, does it cover all our institutions at this stage and what funding is available for that scheme? That will assist us in reaching a position. I think they are the only questions I have at this stage.</text>
        </talker>
        <talker role="member" id="3125">
          <name>The Hon. R.P. WORTLEY</name>
          <house>Legislative Council</house>
          <text id="20120531ee590b549d33415a80000225">
            <by role="member" id="3125">The Hon. R.P. WORTLEY: </by> I thank the honourable member for giving us the opportunity of answering these questions. Before you solidify your support or lock in behind the amendment, we will give you some information, because a number bodies are opposed to that amendment. We will talk to you about that in order to get some understanding on it.</text>
          <text id="20120531ee590b549d33415a80000226">Clause passed.</text>
          <text id="20120531ee590b549d33415a80000227">Clauses 2 and 3 passed.</text>
          <text id="20120531ee590b549d33415a80000228">Progress reported; committee to sit again.</text>
        </talker>
      </subproceeding>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>