<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2012-05-31" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1377" />
  <endPage num="1436" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>South Australian Brand</name>
      <text id="201205313b0199c8189148deb0000485">
        <heading>SOUTH AUSTRALIAN BRAND</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3126" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. D.G.E. HOOD</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-05-31">
            <name>SOUTH AUSTRALIAN BRAND</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2012-05-31T15:16:00" />
        <text id="201205313b0199c8189148deb0000486">
          <timeStamp time="2012-05-31T15:16:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3126">The Hon. D.G.E. HOOD (15:16):</by>  Thank you, Mr President. Would the minister like to comment on the criticism that having four different slogans on the numberplates for South Australia—the defence state, the road state, the wine state and whatever the other one is—creates a lack of clarity about our image interstate?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Agriculture</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Forests</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Regional Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Tourism</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Status of Women</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-05-31">
            <name>SOUTH AUSTRALIAN BRAND</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2012-05-31T15:16:00" />
        <text id="201205313b0199c8189148deb0000487">
          <timeStamp time="2012-05-31T15:16:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO (Minister for Agriculture, Food and Fisheries, Minister for Forests, Minister for Regional Development, Minister for Tourism, Minister for the Status of Women) (15:16):</by>  I thank the honourable member for his question. I think that it's—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1704">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201205313b0199c8189148deb0000488">
          <by role="member" id="1704">The PRESIDENT:</by>  Certainly a wining state.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201205313b0199c8189148deb0000489">
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO:</by>  Sorry, Mr President?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1704">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201205313b0199c8189148deb0000490">
          <by role="member" id="1704">The PRESIDENT:</by>  I said 'a wining state'.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201205313b0199c8189148deb0000491">
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO:</by>  It is always a much clearer and focused message if the message can be singular; however, I do understand that, in some cases, there is a collection of themes that can be put under a particular brand. I am not aware of what research went in behind the work that was done on plates, so I am not too sure what underpins it, but it has been my view that, often, a single-focus message is received more clearly. But as I said, there are different points of view about that.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1704">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201205313b0199c8189148deb0000492">
          <by role="member" id="1704">The PRESIDENT:</by>  Well, the Victorians have it 'the place to be' and they are all over here with their numberplates. The Hon. Ms Franks.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>