<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2012-05-30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1325" />
  <endPage num="1379" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Bills</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Telecommunications (Interception) Bill</name>
      <text id="2012053090064cf07d73465580000791">
        <heading>TELECOMMUNICATIONS (INTERCEPTION) BILL</heading>
      </text>
      <subproceeding>
        <name>Introduction and First Reading</name>
        <text id="2012053090064cf07d73465580000792">
          <heading>Introduction and First Reading</heading>
        </text>
        <text id="2012053090064cf07d73465580000793">Received from the House of Assembly and read a first time.</text>
      </subproceeding>
      <subproceeding>
        <name>Second Reading</name>
        <text id="2012053090064cf07d73465580000794">
          <heading>Second Reading</heading>
        </text>
        <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="speech">
          <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
          <house>Legislative Council</house>
          <electorate id="">Minister for Agriculture, Food and Fisheries, Minister for Forests, Minister for Regional Development, Minister for Tourism, Minister for the Status of Women</electorate>
          <startTime time="2012-05-30T18:21:00" />
          <text id="2012053090064cf07d73465580000795">
            <timeStamp time="2012-05-30T18:21:00" />
            <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO (Minister for Agriculture, Food and Fisheries, Minister for Forests, Minister for Regional Development, Minister for Tourism, Minister for the Status of Women) (18:21):</by>  I move:</text>
          <text id="2012053090064cf07d73465580000796">
            <inserted>That this bill be now read a second time.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text continued="true" id="2012053090064cf07d73465580000797">I seek leave to have the second reading explanation inserted in <term>Hansard </term>without my reading it.</text>
          <text id="2012053090064cf07d73465580000798">Leave granted.</text>
          <text id="2012053090064cf07d73465580000799">
            <inserted>The <term>Telecommunications (Interception) Bill 2012</term> is a companion bill to the <term>Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Bill 2012</term>. Its purpose is to enable the Independent Commissioner Against Corruption (the 'ICAC') to be declared an agency under the <term>Telecommunications (Interception &amp; Access) Act 1979</term> of the Commonwealth and so enable it to obtain telephone intercept warrants for the purposes of investigating corruption in public administration. The measure replaces the <term>Telecommunications (Interception) Act 1988</term>.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="2012053090064cf07d73465580000800">
            <inserted>In order for the Commonwealth Attorney-General to declare the ICAC as an agency under the Commonwealth legislation, State legislation that meets all of the preconditions for a declaration set out in section 35 of the Commonwealth Act must be enacted, including provisions for compliance auditing of the agency's use of telephone intercepts. It is also necessary for the Commonwealth Act to be amended to define the ICAC to be an eligible authority and for a number of other consequential amendments to be made. Following amendment of the Commonwealth Act, the Premier will seek a declaration under section 34 of the Commonwealth Act that the ICAC is an agency for the purposes of that Act.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="2012053090064cf07d73465580000801">
            <inserted>SAPOL already constitutes a declared agency under the Commonwealth Act and this status will not be affected by the measure. SAPOL has been consulted and supports the measure.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="2012053090064cf07d73465580000802">
            <inserted>There have been an extensive number of amendments made to the Commonwealth Act since the State Act was enacted and this measure will bring the State Act into line with the current requirements of the Commonwealth Act.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="2012053090064cf07d73465580000803">
            <inserted>The review agency for compliance auditing of SAPOL's use of telephone intercepts will continue to be the Police Complaints Authority (to be renamed the Police Ombudsman under consequential amendments in the <term>Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Bill 2012</term>). Auditing will continue to be required at least once in each period of 6 months, with a report being provided to the Attorney-General. The existing powers supporting the conduct of an audit are reproduced in the measure.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="2012053090064cf07d73465580000804">
            <inserted>As it is essential for the ICAC to maintain independence from all public agencies and authorities, it is proposed that review of the ICAC's records in relation to telephone intercepts will be performed by a person who is independent of the ICAC and is appointed by the Governor as a review agency.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="2012053090064cf07d73465580000805">
            <inserted>I confirm that the ICAC's use of telephone intercepts will be limited to investigations into corruption in public administration.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="2012053090064cf07d73465580000806">
            <inserted>I commend the Bill to the House</inserted>
          </text>
          <bookmark>Explanation of Clauses</bookmark>
          <text id="2012053090064cf07d73465580000807">
            <inserted>
              <subheading>Explanation of Clauses</subheading>
            </inserted>
          </text>
          <page num="1379" />
          <text id="2012053090064cf07d73465580000808">
            <item>
              <inserted>1—Short title</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="2012053090064cf07d73465580000809">
            <item>
              <inserted>2—Interpretation</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="2012053090064cf07d73465580000810">
            <inserted>This clause contains definitions for the purposes of the measure. Warrants for telecommunications interception are obtained under the <term>Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979</term> of the Commonwealth. This measure includes requirements relating to record keeping, reporting and review that are required under the Commonwealth Act to be included in State schemes. Warrants may only be obtained by SA Police or the Independent Commissioner Against Corruption.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text continued="true" id="2012053090064cf07d73465580000811">
            <inserted>3—Obligations of chief officer of eligible authority relating to records</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="2012053090064cf07d73465580000812">
            <inserted>This clause requires the chief officer of the relevant State agencies to keep records in the same way as is required under the Commonwealth Act in respect of Commonwealth agencies. Sections 5 and 7 of the current Act are the corresponding provisions.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text continued="true" id="2012053090064cf07d73465580000813">
            <inserted>4—Obligations of chief officer of eligible authority to report to Attorney-General</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="2012053090064cf07d73465580000814">
            <inserted>This clause requires the chief officer of the relevant State agencies to give to the Attorney-General a report about each warrant issued and an annual report of the same kind as must be given by Commonwealth agencies to the Commonwealth Minister. Section 6 of the current Act is the corresponding provision.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text continued="true" id="2012053090064cf07d73465580000815">
            <inserted>5—Obligations and powers of review agency</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="2012053090064cf07d73465580000816">
            <inserted>This clause requires the records of the relevant State agencies to be inspected at least once in each period of 6 months and a report to be given to the Attorney-General. The Police Ombudsman is to conduct the review in relation to SA Police and an independent person appointed by the Governor is to conduct the review in relation to the Independent Commissioner Against Corruption. Necessary powers to support the conduct of a review are included as in the current Act. Sections 8, 9, 9A, 10 and 11 of the current Act are the corresponding provisions.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text continued="true" id="2012053090064cf07d73465580000817">
            <inserted>6—Obligations of Attorney-General</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="2012053090064cf07d73465580000818">
            <inserted>This clause requires the Attorney-General to give copies of reports to the Commonwealth Minister. Section 13 of the current Act is the corresponding provision.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text continued="true" id="2012053090064cf07d73465580000819">
            <inserted>7—Regulations</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="2012053090064cf07d73465580000820">
            <inserted>This clause provides general regulation making power.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text continued="true" id="2012053090064cf07d73465580000821">
            <inserted>Schedule 1—Repeal of <term>Telecommunications (Interception) Act 1988</term></inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="2012053090064cf07d73465580000822">
            <inserted>The current Act is repealed.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="2012053090064cf07d73465580000823">Debate adjourned on motion of Hon. T.J. Stephens.</text>
          <text id="2012053090064cf07d73465580000824" />
          <text id="2012053090064cf07d73465580000825">At 18:23 the council adjourned until Thursday 31 May 2012 at 11:00.</text>
          <text id="2012053090064cf07d73465580000826" />
        </talker>
      </subproceeding>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>