<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2012-05-30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1325" />
  <endPage num="1379" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Printer Cartridge Scam</name>
      <text id="20120530ceeabb1b7cb34ccea0000214">
        <heading>PRINTER CARTRIDGE SCAM</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-05-30">
            <name>PRINTER CARTRIDGE SCAM</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2012-05-30T15:10:00" />
        <text id="20120530ceeabb1b7cb34ccea0000215">
          <timeStamp time="2012-05-30T15:10:00" />
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (15:10):</by>  I seek leave to make an explanation prior to directing a question to the minister representing the Minister for Finance on the subject of 'cartridgegate'.</text>
        <text id="20120530ceeabb1b7cb34ccea0000216">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20120530ceeabb1b7cb34ccea0000217">
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS:</by>  On 6 February this year, police commissioner Hyde indicated publicly that, in relation to 'cartridgegate', there had been inquiries conducted by the Anti-Corruption Branch of SAPOL and there have been a number of matters referred to the DPP for advice as to whether or not prosecutions ought to proceed. However, on 30 March of this year, the then director of public prosecutions, Mr Stephen Pallaras, told FIVEaa:</text>
        <text id="20120530ceeabb1b7cb34ccea0000218">
          <inserted>Where we're at the moment is I think at the moment, it has not reached my office as far as I'm aware and I think the investigation is still underway...</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="20120530ceeabb1b7cb34ccea0000219">It would appear, on a clear reading of the statements of the police commissioner and the director of public prosecutions, that there is a conflict between the positions enunciated in February and March of this year. My questions to the minister are as follows:</text>
        <text id="20120530ceeabb1b7cb34ccea0000220">1.&amp;#x9;As at that date, 30 March 2012, had any matters in relation to 'cartridgegate' been referred to the Director of Public Prosecutions for advice and, if so, how many matters and how many individuals were involved and what particular departments were involved?</text>
        <text id="20120530ceeabb1b7cb34ccea0000221">2.&amp;#x9;Since 30 March, have any further matters in relation to 'cartridgegate' been referred to the Director of Public Prosecutions for advice and, if so, how many individuals are involved in those matters and what departments or agencies are involved?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3125" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. R.P. WORTLEY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister for State/Local Government Relations</electorate>
        <startTime time="2012-05-30T15:12:00" />
        <text id="20120530ceeabb1b7cb34ccea0000222">
          <timeStamp time="2012-05-30T15:12:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3125">The Hon. R.P. WORTLEY (Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister for State/Local Government Relations) (15:12):</by>  I thank the member for his questions. I will take them on notice and refer them to the Minister for Finance in another place and get an answer back as soon as possible.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>