<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2012-03-28" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="683" />
  <endPage num="786" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Bills</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Forestry (Miscellaneous) Amendment Bill</name>
      <text id="201203286d44995308de486c90000838">
        <heading>FORESTRY (MISCELLANEOUS) AMENDMENT BILL</heading>
      </text>
      <subproceeding>
        <name>Second Reading</name>
        <text id="201203286d44995308de486c90000839">
          <heading>Second Reading</heading>
        </text>
        <page num="743" />
        <text id="201203286d44995308de486c90000840">Adjourned debate on second reading.</text>
        <text id="201203286d44995308de486c90000841">(Continued from 14 March 2012.)</text>
        <talker role="member" id="1820" kind="speech">
          <name>The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY</name>
          <house>Legislative Council</house>
          <electorate id="">Leader of the Opposition</electorate>
          <startTime time="2012-03-28T17:16:00" />
          <text id="201203286d44995308de486c90000842">
            <timeStamp time="2012-03-28T17:16:00" />
            <by role="member" id="1820">The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY (Leader of the Opposition) (17:16):</by>  I rise to speak to the Hon. Robert Brokenshire's bill, the Forestry (Miscellaneous) Amendment Bill 2012. I do not intend to speak at any great length but members will be aware that this bill has arisen from the member's and probably a number of people's frustration in this chamber about the arrogant approach of the government to sell our state's forestry assets.</text>
          <text id="201203286d44995308de486c90000843">It is my understanding that the intention of the Hon. Mr Brokenshire's bill is to somehow enshrine the recommendations of the Roundtable that have been put together by Treasurer Snelling to identify the non-negotiables in the sale of the forests; the sort of things that the community would be happy for that the Hon. Robert Brokenshire is looking to try to enshrine in legislation. We have, at the moment, a forestry select committee looking at the sale of the forestry assets and so it is my intention to move an amendment to this bill that it be referred to the select committee.</text>
          <text id="201203286d44995308de486c90000844">I have just had some discussions with the Clerk and it seems the most sensible way for me to deal with that procedurally is to foreshadow today that that is my intention. I have had some discussions with the Hon. Robert Brokenshire and he is happy for it to be considered by the select committee. It makes sense given that we are addressing the whole sale issue on that committee. So I foreshadow today that next Wednesday of sitting I will move the amendment, but at this point in time I will seek leave to conclude my remarks.</text>
          <text id="201203286d44995308de486c90000845">Leave granted; debate adjourned.</text>
        </talker>
      </subproceeding>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>