<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2012-03-27" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="605" />
  <endPage num="685" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Workplace Safety</name>
      <text id="20120327c2e814ed1cfc4801b0000189">
        <heading>WORKPLACE SAFETY</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4363" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. T.A. FRANKS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-03-27">
            <name>WORKPLACE SAFETY</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2012-03-27T15:19:00" />
        <text id="20120327c2e814ed1cfc4801b0000190">
          <timeStamp time="2012-03-27T15:19:00" />
          <by role="member" id="4363">The Hon. T.A. FRANKS (15:19):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before directing a question to the Minister for Industrial Relations on worker safety and government contracts.</text>
        <text id="20120327c2e814ed1cfc4801b0000191">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4363" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. T.A. FRANKS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20120327c2e814ed1cfc4801b0000192">
          <by role="member" id="4363">The Hon. T.A. FRANKS:</by>  Following on from revelations over past months that bus drivers' safety has been increasingly threatened, including verbal and physical assaults that have arisen from complaints about delayed or missing bus services, it has been reported that incidents have arisen largely as a response to unrealistic deadlines being set as conditions of contracts and tenders undertaken by the private operators. I believe that we have also seen here these separate, unrelated incidents as part of a larger pattern not only in public transport but across the board.</text>
        <text id="20120327c2e814ed1cfc4801b0000193">Through my role in chairing the desal project select committee, I have heard time and time again about safety coming second behind meeting deadlines, and these deadlines appear to be set to suit government spin doctors' timelines rather than a realistic analysis of construction realities. Concerns have also been raised around the Adelaide Oval redevelopment project and schedule; that has seen the government announce a $5 million bonus to finish (ostensibly) in time for the Ashes but also, coincidentally, just in time for the March 2014 state election.</text>
        <text id="20120327c2e814ed1cfc4801b0000194">My question to the minister is: what undertaking do you give, as Minister for Industrial Relations in the Labor Weatherill government, to ensure that workers' lives are not put at risk through unreasonable time frames imposed or mandated by government contracts?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3125" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. R.P. WORTLEY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister for State/Local Government Relations</electorate>
        <startTime time="2012-03-27T15:21:00" />
        <text id="20120327c2e814ed1cfc4801b0000195">
          <timeStamp time="2012-03-27T15:21:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3125">The Hon. R.P. WORTLEY (Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister for State/Local Government Relations) (15:21):</by>  I would like to thank the honourable member for her very important question. I also acknowledge her interest in worker safety in this state over a long period of time. First of all, as Minister for Industrial Relations, I would expect, when contracts are given out—and I am quite sure this takes place at the moment—that no worker would be expected to be put into a dangerous or unsafe situation.</text>
        <text id="20120327c2e814ed1cfc4801b0000196">It is an unfortunate fact that, on large projects, people sometimes do get injured, and sometimes, unfortunately, are killed. These incidents, as tragic as they are, the government will always try to keep to a minimum, or to prevent them altogether. All I can say is that, as Minister for Industrial Relations, I would expect that no contract is undertaken or given out to be signed that would put a person—a worker or anyone—in danger of losing their life or being injured.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>