<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2012-03-15" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="555" />
  <endPage num="605" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Salary Sacrificing</name>
      <text id="201203159e63de1e8b9d485290000080">
        <heading>SALARY SACRIFICING</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3489" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. R.L. BROKENSHIRE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-03-15">
            <name>SALARY SACRIFICING</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2012-03-15T14:36:00" />
        <text id="201203159e63de1e8b9d485290000081">
          <timeStamp time="2012-03-15T14:36:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3489">The Hon. R.L. BROKENSHIRE (14:36): </by> I have a supplementary question arising from the answer. Can the minister confirm to the house that he is satisfied that this is the best process: to have one provider only, based on the history of having one case management provider in WorkCover, and the backflip by the government?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3125" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. R.P. WORTLEY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister for State/Local Government Relations</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-03-15">
            <name>SALARY SACRIFICING</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2012-03-15T14:36:00" />
        <page num="560" />
        <text id="201203159e63de1e8b9d485290000082">
          <timeStamp time="2012-03-15T14:36:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3125">The Hon. R.P. WORTLEY (Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister for State/Local Government Relations) (14:36): </by> The whole process of this has gone through due process. There has been a very in-depth requirement for transparency and accountability so, naturally, as minister, I would support the end result.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>