<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2012-02-29" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="305" />
  <endPage num="368" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Tourism Commission</name>
      <text id="201202298584f1fc955d4942b0000058">
        <heading>TOURISM COMMISSION</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-02-29">
            <name>TOURISM COMMISSION</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2012-02-29T14:29:00" />
        <page num="308" />
        <text id="201202298584f1fc955d4942b0000059">
          <timeStamp time="2012-02-29T14:29:00" />
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (14:29):</by>  I have a supplementary question arising out of the answer. What advice has been provided to the minister as to which legal firm or which legal adviser has been appointed by the South Australian Tourism Commission, and is there a cap or limit? Given that the minister has advised $145,000, is there a cap or limit on the total legal costs?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Agriculture, Food and Fisheries, Minister for Forests, Minister for Regional Development, Minister for Tourism, Minister for the Status of Women</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-02-29">
            <name>TOURISM COMMISSION</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2012-02-29T14:29:00" />
        <text id="201202298584f1fc955d4942b0000060">
          <timeStamp time="2012-02-29T14:29:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO (Minister for Agriculture, Food and Fisheries, Minister for Forests, Minister for Regional Development, Minister for Tourism, Minister for the Status of Women) (14:29): </by> Who the South Australian Tourism Commission hires or seeks to obtain advice from, the consultants that it uses and the way it operates commercially are decisions that are completely independent of government. They are an independent statutory authority that operates in a commercial way.</text>
        <text id="201202298584f1fc955d4942b0000061">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="55">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1704">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201202298584f1fc955d4942b0000062">
          <by role="member" id="1704">The PRESIDENT:</by>  Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201202298584f1fc955d4942b0000063">
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO: </by> As I have indicated, the terms of that approval, including the hourly rate that may be charged, were, in fact, consistent with the Crown Solicitor's advice.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1704" kind="interjection">
        <name>An honourable member</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201202298584f1fc955d4942b0000064">
          <by role="member" id="1704">An honourable member: </by> Who's been appointed?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201202298584f1fc955d4942b0000065">
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO:</by>  I don't know who was appointed. It would be a reputable legal firm. My understanding is, as I reported in this place before, that the Crown investigation has been completed so, in respect of that matter, my understanding is there would not be any further legal advice required. So, in respect of that matter that I have spoken of in this place, my understanding is that has been completed, but I am happy to check that and, if need be, bring back any further matters that might be relevant to that.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>