<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2011-11-29" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4743" />
  <endPage num="4817" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Bills</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Workers Rehabilitation and Compensation (Employer Payments) Amendment Bill</name>
      <text id="20111129665714e8c9bb4e4790001034">
        <heading>WORKERS REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION (EMPLOYER PAYMENTS) AMENDMENT BILL</heading>
      </text>
      <subproceeding>
        <name>Committee Stage</name>
        <text id="20111129665714e8c9bb4e4790001035">
          <heading>Committee Stage</heading>
        </text>
        <text id="20111129665714e8c9bb4e4790001036">In committee (resumed on motion).</text>
        <text id="20111129665714e8c9bb4e4790001037">Clause 1.</text>
        <talker role="member" id="1821">
          <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
          <house>Legislative Council</house>
          <text id="20111129665714e8c9bb4e4790001038">
            <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO: </by> A question was asked by the Hon. Rob Lucas to clause 1. I have the answer to that question which I would like to take this opportunity to put on the record.</text>
          <text id="20111129665714e8c9bb4e4790001039">The Hon. Rob Lucas asked about the caps to premium discounts. I confirm that the transitional provisions, including the level of capping and the period over which the caps will apply, will be properly consulted on following the passage of this bill through parliament.</text>
          <text id="20111129665714e8c9bb4e4790001040">I can also confirm that, consistent with the position paper released by WorkCover in July 2011, it is envisaged that transitional arrangements will apply for the first four years of the new approach and that any increase or decrease in the employer's premium rate will be capped at 125 per cent of the previous year's rate in the period 1 July 2012 and 30 July 2016 subject to any changes agreed to during the consultation process.</text>
          <text id="20111129665714e8c9bb4e4790001041">The government is aware that, with any change to the amount employers pay, there needs to be in-built protections. The government has listened to employers and has included transitional provisions which will cap the amount of discount or increase to premiums.</text>
          <text id="20111129665714e8c9bb4e4790001042">In relation to the queries from the MBA about the impact of those employers just encapsulated in the experience rating scheme, it is correct that for an employer the amount of premium based on their own experience will be limited. Smaller employers are significantly less likely to experience a claim, therefore their claims experience is not an appropriate lever to significantly influence behavioural impact on the amount they pay.</text>
          <text id="20111129665714e8c9bb4e4790001043">The larger an employer is the more influence they have over injury prevention and injury management; therefore, it is appropriate that their claims experience is a larger component of their premium calculation. There must be an entry threshold for any scheme like this. The entry threshold to the experience rating system has been determined following analysis of the historical claims reporting data for South Australia and consistent with advice received from the scheme's independent actuary Finity Consulting.</text>
          <page num="4806" />
          <text id="20111129665714e8c9bb4e4790001044">Progress reported; committee to sit again.</text>
        </talker>
      </subproceeding>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>