<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2011-11-10" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4347" />
  <endPage num="4439" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Clean Energy Supplement</name>
      <text id="20111110e984a77dd56d4c77b0000781">
        <heading>CLEAN ENERGY SUPPLEMENT</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3128" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. A. BRESSINGTON</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2011-11-10">
            <name>CLEAN ENERGY SUPPLEMENT</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2011-11-10T14:42:00" />
        <text id="20111110e984a77dd56d4c77b0000782">
          <timeStamp time="2011-11-10T14:42:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3128">The Hon. A. BRESSINGTON (14:42): </by> I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking the Minister for Social Housing a question about the government's intention in relation to the clean energy supplement.</text>
        <text id="20111110e984a77dd56d4c77b0000783">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3128" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. A. BRESSINGTON</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20111110e984a77dd56d4c77b0000784">
          <by role="member" id="3128">The Hon. A. BRESSINGTON: </by> I have been contacted by a number of concerned citizens about the clean energy supplement because earlier this year this government encountered severe criticism from pensioners and members of our community in receipt of government payments for increasing the rent for government social housing, which, in effect, stole the long-overdue and hard-fought-for increase in their pensions. For years we heard of the continual struggles of pensioners to afford just the basic necessities, with many forced to go without or delay the purchase of medications, avoiding heating or cooling their homes and giving away loved pets because they were unable to afford them.</text>
        <text id="20111110e984a77dd56d4c77b0000785">Finally, in 2010, the federal government recognised this hardship and announced an increase in the pension. Despite promising pensioners and the federal government that this increase would be quarantined, this state government—the Rann government—to the dismay and criticism of all promptly backflipped and increased the rent on public housing, absorbing the pension increase. Now that the package of carbon tax bills have been passed by the federal parliament—and members are well aware of my view on that—pensioners and others in receipt of government payments are being promised from May next year a clean energy advance and later a clean energy supplement to the tune of $218 per year to assist in meeting the cost of this pointless tax.</text>
        <text id="20111110e984a77dd56d4c77b0000786">Constituents are fearful of the true cost of the carbon tax and whether their budgets will extend to cover the increases in cost of everyday items, even with the promised supplements. Those pensioners living in public and community housing have also expressed their concerns to me that the meagre assistance promised may very well be stolen from them, just as was the 2010 pension increase, by what we believe to be a greedy and callous state government. On behalf of these constituents my questions to the minister are:</text>
        <text id="20111110e984a77dd56d4c77b0000787">1.&amp;#x9;Will the minister assure pensioners in state housing that the government will not increase housing rents to steal away the meagre supplement promised to them to help cover the cost of the carbon tax?</text>
        <text id="20111110e984a77dd56d4c77b0000788">2.&amp;#x9;Will the minister provide the number of people who have been unable to pay their power bills in South Australia in the past 12 months?</text>
        <text id="20111110e984a77dd56d4c77b0000789">3.&amp;#x9;Is the government intending to increase the energy concession to assist pensioners and low income earners to meet the spiralling cost of electricity and other utilities?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3122" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. I.K. HUNTER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Communities and Social Inclusion</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Social Housing</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Disabilities</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Youth</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Volunteers</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2011-11-10T14:44:00" />
        <text id="20111110e984a77dd56d4c77b0000790">
          <timeStamp time="2011-11-10T14:44:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3122">The Hon. I.K. HUNTER (Minister for Communities and Social Inclusion, Minister for Social Housing, Minister for Disabilities, Minister for Youth, Minister for Volunteers) (14:44):</by>  I thank the honourable member for her most important question. Whilst I have not been briefed exactly on the topic that she has just raised, it is my understanding that increases to tenants or members of the public who are in our Housing Trust tenancies or who are receiving some federal assistance, if that increase is paid as a supplement as opposed to an increase in the pension that it will be quarantined from being assessable for Housing Trust rental.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>