<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2011-11-10" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4347" />
  <endPage num="4439" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Ministerial Statement</name>
    <text id="20111110666919a0e5924fee90000676">
      <heading>Ministerial Statement</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Livestock Slaughter</name>
      <text id="20111110666919a0e5924fee90000677">
        <heading>LIVESTOCK SLAUGHTER</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="speech">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Agriculture</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Forests</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Regional Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Tourism</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Status of Women</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2011-11-10T14:19:00" />
        <text id="20111110666919a0e5924fee90000678">
          <timeStamp time="2011-11-10T14:19:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO (Minister for Agriculture, Food and Fisheries, Minister for Forests, Minister for Regional Development, Minister for Tourism, Minister for the Status of Women) (14:19):</by>  I seek leave to make a ministerial statement.</text>
        <text id="20111110666919a0e5924fee90000679">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="speech" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20111110666919a0e5924fee90000680">
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO:</by>  I would like to put on record clarification of the requirements for the slaughter of animals and correct some of the confusing statements made by the Hon. Tammy Franks.</text>
        <text id="20111110666919a0e5924fee90000681">All slaughter of animals Australia-wide is covered by a national standard, the Australian Standard for Hygienic Production and Transportation of Meat and Meat Products for Human Consumption, AS 4696:2007. The national standard, which South Australia supports, allows ritual slaughter. All abattoirs in South Australia are registered and required to adhere to the national standard. They must have in place procedures to alleviate unnecessary injury, pain and suffering of animals. Post stunning in humane circumstances is required by the standard and is an adopted practice for Islamic meat processing. A small number of abattoirs in South Australia process without pre-stunning—sheep and goats, and I have recently been informed, a small number of cattle. As I have said previously, I am advised that slaughter is carried out in compliance with the national guidelines and agreed welfare framework.</text>
        <text id="20111110666919a0e5924fee90000682">The Hon. Tammy Franks seems to have wilfully misled both the chamber and the public by stating that there are exemptions applying to ritual slaughter. In effect, she has repeatedly confused both the chamber and the public on this topic. Contrary to her repeated assertions, there are no exemptions from the national standards applying to the animals killed for human consumption in South Australia for particular religious groups, and that applies to the process of stunning. As I have committed in the chamber previously—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3164">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20111110666919a0e5924fee90000683">
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. WADE:</by>  Point of order, Mr President.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1704">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20111110666919a0e5924fee90000684">
          <by role="member" id="1704">The PRESIDENT:</by>  Order! The Hon. Mr Wade has a point of order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3164">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20111110666919a0e5924fee90000685">
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. WADE:</by>  If I heard the minister correctly, she suggested that the member had wilfully misled this chamber. If the minister is asserting that she should do so by substantive motion.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1704">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20111110666919a0e5924fee90000686">
          <by role="member" id="1704">The PRESIDENT:</by>  The Hon. Mr Wade has a point of order; the honourable minister should stick to the—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3164">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20111110666919a0e5924fee90000687">
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. WADE:</by>  She should withdraw her allegation if she is not willing to move it.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20111110666919a0e5924fee90000688">
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO:</by>  Thank you, Mr President. I thank you for your guidance. As I have committed in this chamber previously—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3164">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20111110666919a0e5924fee90000689">
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. WADE:</by>  On a point of order, Mr President.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1704">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20111110666919a0e5924fee90000690">
          <by role="member" id="1704">The PRESIDENT:</by>  Order! You should withdraw those remarks.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3164">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20111110666919a0e5924fee90000691">
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. WADE:</by>  Unless she wants to move it by motion.</text>
        <text id="20111110666919a0e5924fee90000692">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="55">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1704">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <page num="4384" />
        <text id="20111110666919a0e5924fee90000693">
          <by role="member" id="1704">The PRESIDENT:</by>  Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20111110666919a0e5924fee90000694">
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO:</by>  I am happy to move it by motion, so in the interim do I need to withdraw the statement—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3164" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. Wade</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20111110666919a0e5924fee90000695">
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. Wade:</by>  'Wilfully misled'.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20111110666919a0e5924fee90000696">
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO:</by>  —that Tammy Franks seems to have wilfully—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="2742" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. J.M.A. Lensink</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20111110666919a0e5924fee90000697">
          <by role="member" id="2742">The Hon. J.M.A. Lensink:</by>  The Hon. Tammy Franks.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20111110666919a0e5924fee90000698">
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO:</by>  —I beg your pardon—the Hon. Tammy Franks seems to have wilfully misled both the chamber—</text>
        <text id="20111110666919a0e5924fee90000699">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="84">The Hon. T.A. Franks interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1704">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20111110666919a0e5924fee90000700">
          <by role="member" id="1704">The PRESIDENT:</by>  Order! The Hon. Ms Franks.</text>
        <text id="20111110666919a0e5924fee90000701">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="55">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1704">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20111110666919a0e5924fee90000702">
          <by role="member" id="1704">The PRESIDENT:</by>  Order!</text>
        <text id="20111110666919a0e5924fee90000703">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="55">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20111110666919a0e5924fee90000704">
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO:</by>  Do you want me to withdraw this or not, for goodness sake?</text>
        <text id="20111110666919a0e5924fee90000705">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="55">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1704">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20111110666919a0e5924fee90000706">
          <by role="member" id="1704">The PRESIDENT:</by>  Order! If you want it withdrawn, you should just sit there in silence. The honourable minister has been asked to withdraw it.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20111110666919a0e5924fee90000707">
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO:</by>  And I am seeking to withdraw the comment that the Hon. Tammy Franks seems to have wilfully—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1704">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20111110666919a0e5924fee90000708">
          <by role="member" id="1704">The PRESIDENT:</by>  Just withdraw it, please.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20111110666919a0e5924fee90000709">
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO:</by>  Withdraw what, though?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1704">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20111110666919a0e5924fee90000710">
          <by role="member" id="1704">The PRESIDENT:</by>  Just withdraw those comments. Unless you want to make a substantive motion.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20111110666919a0e5924fee90000711">
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO:</by>  I am not too sure what I am withdrawing, the whole statement or the statement that—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1704">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20111110666919a0e5924fee90000712">
          <by role="member" id="1704">The PRESIDENT:  </by>No, just the words to say—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20111110666919a0e5924fee90000713">
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO:</by>  —the Hon. Tammy Franks seems to have wilfully misled both the chamber and the public.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1704">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20111110666919a0e5924fee90000714">
          <by role="member" id="1704">The PRESIDENT:</by>  Yes.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20111110666919a0e5924fee90000715">
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO:</by>  That is the statement that I seek to withdraw.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1704">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20111110666919a0e5924fee90000716">
          <by role="member" id="1704">The PRESIDENT:</by>  Withdrawing, thank you.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20111110666919a0e5924fee90000717">
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO:</by>  There are no exemptions applying to ritual slaughter as stated by the Hon. Tammy Franks. There are no exemptions that apply here in South Australia—so contrary to the Hon. Tammy Franks' repeated assertion, there are no exemptions from the national standard applying to animals killed for human consumption in South Australia for particular religious groups.</text>
        <text id="20111110666919a0e5924fee90000718">As I have committed in the chamber previously, my agency and I will continue to work for a nationally consistent approach, whilst also working with religious groups in South Australia to continue to improve the standards around the ritual slaughter of animals.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>