<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2011-10-20" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4193" />
  <endPage num="4242" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>WorkCover Corporation</name>
      <text id="20111020bc7c104e3ac94a6e80000165">
        <heading>WORKCOVER CORPORATION</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2011-10-20">
            <name>WORKCOVER CORPORATION</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2011-10-20T15:02:00" />
        <text id="20111020bc7c104e3ac94a6e80000166">
          <timeStamp time="2011-10-20T15:02:00" />
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (15:02):</by>  I seek leave to make an explanation prior to directing a question on the subject of WorkCover to the minister representing the minister for WorkCover.</text>
        <text id="20111020bc7c104e3ac94a6e80000167">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20111020bc7c104e3ac94a6e80000168">
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS:</by>  Recent national surveys have shown that the WorkCover scheme in South Australia has the worst return-to-work figures or records of any scheme in the nation. That has continued for a number of years now and continues even after the government's amendments of 2008.</text>
        <text id="20111020bc7c104e3ac94a6e80000169">Page 1809 of this year's Auditor-General's Report lists related parties' transactions with members of the board of WorkCover. In relation to Ms Sandra De Poi and a company in which she has an interest (De Poi Consulting Pty Ltd), the Auditor-General reports that for the provision of rehab and medical services Ms De Poi's companies, this year, received contracts to the value of $8.4 million—increased from $5.9 million in the previous year and increased from $3.1 million just two years ago. The Auditor-General reports that Ms De Poi's company or companies, in two years, have increased their contracts with WorkCover, or the claims agent for WorkCover, by $5.3 million to a total of $8.4 million or 171 per cent.</text>
        <text id="20111020bc7c104e3ac94a6e80000170">The Auditor-General does record the total expenditure by WorkCover on vocational rehabilitation and medical services. The Auditor-General's Report showed that in the same two years the increase in expenditure on medical services was a mere 5.8 per cent and the increase in expenditure on vocational rehabilitation services in the same two years was 37.8 per cent, compared to the increased value of Ms De Poi's company's contracts of 171 per cent.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1820" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. D.W. Ridgway</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20111020bc7c104e3ac94a6e80000171">
          <by role="member" id="1820">The Hon. D.W. Ridgway:</by>  She is Leon's girlfriend, isn't she?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20111020bc7c104e3ac94a6e80000172">
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS:</by>  I think partner in life, perhaps; I am not sure what the correct descriptor is. On 10 March this year I asked a number of questions, two of which I repeat, to the former minister for WorkCover, the Hon. Bernard Finnigan:</text>
        <text id="20111020bc7c104e3ac94a6e80000173">1.&amp;#x9;Have any concerns been expressed to the minister about the recent significant increase in the value of contracts being awarded to Ms De Poi's companies, and if yes, what action, if any, did he take?</text>
        <page num="4203" />
        <text id="20111020bc7c104e3ac94a6e80000174">2.&amp;#x9;What evidence, if any, is there that the return-to-work outcomes or other outcomes being achieved by Ms De Poi's companies are better than the scheme average and most other providers for each of the 2007-08, 2008-09 and 2009-10 financial years?</text>
        <text id="20111020bc7c104e3ac94a6e80000175">I never received a response to those questions from the Hon. Bernard Finnigan or, indeed, from ministers who followed the Hon. Bernard Finnigan in that particular role. My three questions to the new minister responsible for WorkCover are:</text>
        <text id="20111020bc7c104e3ac94a6e80000176">1.&amp;#x9;Was any work undertaken by the previous ministers for WorkCover to provide answers to the questions that I asked on 10 March and, if so, can they be provided?</text>
        <text id="20111020bc7c104e3ac94a6e80000177">2.&amp;#x9;Have any concerns been expressed to the current minister about the recent significant increase in the value of the contracts being awarded to Ms De Poi's companies? If yes, what action, if any, has he taken?</text>
        <text id="20111020bc7c104e3ac94a6e80000178">3.&amp;#x9;What evidence, if any, is there that the return-to-work outcomes, or other outcomes being achieved by Ms De Poi's companies, are better than the scheme average and most other providers for each of the 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10 and now 2010-11 financial years?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Regional Development, Minister for Public Sector Management, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Consumer Affairs, Minister for Government Enterprises, Minister for Gambling</electorate>
        <startTime time="2011-10-20T15:06:00" />
        <text id="20111020bc7c104e3ac94a6e80000179">
          <timeStamp time="2011-10-20T15:06:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO (Minister for Regional Development, Minister for Public Sector Management, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Consumer Affairs, Minister for Government Enterprises, Minister for Gambling) (15:06):</by>  I thank the member for his questions and will refer them to the relevant ministers in another place and bring back a response.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>