<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2011-09-27" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3885" />
  <endPage num="3925" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Teenage Runaways</name>
      <text id="20110927f9844aba7db54da3a0000250">
        <heading>TEENAGE RUNAWAYS</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3128" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. A. BRESSINGTON</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2011-09-27">
            <name>TEENAGE RUNAWAYS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2011-09-27T15:57:00" />
        <text id="20110927f9844aba7db54da3a0000251">
          <timeStamp time="2011-09-27T15:57:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3128">The Hon. A. BRESSINGTON (15:57):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking the minister representing the Minister for Police questions about police handling of teenage runaways.</text>
        <text id="20110927f9844aba7db54da3a0000252">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3128" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. A. BRESSINGTON</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20110927f9844aba7db54da3a0000253">
          <by role="member" id="3128">The Hon. A. BRESSINGTON:</by>  It is with regret that I again need to rise to discuss the case of a runaway teenager, where the parents certainly feel that the police failed to assist their family to be reunited when their 15-year-old son ran away from home. He did so after being grounded for going against what were reasonable parental controls and on the insistence of his girlfriend of the same age, who comes from what can be described only as a dysfunctional background. Early on Easter Sunday morning, the boy arranged to be collected by his girlfriend's stepfather, who then drove the two to the girlfriend's brother's place.</text>
        <text id="20110927f9844aba7db54da3a0000254">After calling the police, the mother was informed of her son's location. She wanted to see her son, and it was arranged by the police for two officers to meet the mother at the brother's home, several hours drive from where they were living. The police informed the mother that the brother was well known to them, with all that that implies. The girlfriend had previously disclosed that her brother had sexually abused her.</text>
        <text id="20110927f9844aba7db54da3a0000255">At this point in time, it would have been appropriate for the police to advise the parents that they could access or apply for a child protection restraining order, but that was not done. Instead, the mother was informed that, while she could speak to her son, if she attempted to take him home, she would be arrested and charged with assault—that is, the mother of a 15-year-old boy. Unfortunately, having been told that no law required him to go home, he did not do so.</text>
        <text id="20110927f9844aba7db54da3a0000256">From thereon, the parents reported that they were treated with suspicion by police, who basically implied that the son must have had a reason to run away from home. The police inaction is traceable to a fiction that is seemingly being created that children at the age of 15 have a right to leave home. This was the standard refrain and something the mother became increasingly frustrated with hearing. Further, the police seemingly presumed that the boy had good reason for doing so, despite making no inquiries at all about the safety or suitability of the family home.</text>
        <text id="20110927f9844aba7db54da3a0000257">This attitude is not exclusive to police, the school counsellor at Whyalla school and the nursing staff at Whyalla hospital. After the young boy attempted suicide, the mother was contacted and asked for parental consent to medical treatment and then was told that she could not go to the hospital to see her son.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1704">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20110927f9844aba7db54da3a0000258">
          <by role="member" id="1704">The PRESIDENT:</by>  I remind the honourable member that matters of interest are tomorrow.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3128">
        <name>The Hon. A. BRESSINGTON</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20110927f9844aba7db54da3a0000259">
          <by role="member" id="3128">The Hon. A. BRESSINGTON: </by> Mr President, this isn't any longer than any other member's question.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1704">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20110927f9844aba7db54da3a0000260">
          <by role="member" id="1704">The PRESIDENT:</by>  I think it is, quite a bit.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3128">
        <name>The Hon. A. BRESSINGTON</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20110927f9844aba7db54da3a0000261">
          <by role="member" id="3128">The Hon. A. BRESSINGTON: </by> Families SA are among the myriad others enabling, if not encouraging, this boy's choice to run away from home. Our police can and should be doing more to investigate these situations and working to reunite families where no abuse or neglect has occurred. My questions to the police minister are:</text>
        <text id="20110927f9844aba7db54da3a0000262">1.&amp;#x9;Does the minister agree that 15-year-old children do not have a right to leave home and that police were wrong to inform both the mother and her son that there was such a law?</text>
        <text id="20110927f9844aba7db54da3a0000263">2.&amp;#x9;As I have asked previously (and had no answer), does the minister concede that this parliament's intent of empowering parents to protect teenage runaways is being undermined by what is clearly police reluctance to acknowledge the existence of parental rights?</text>
        <text id="20110927f9844aba7db54da3a0000264">3.&amp;#x9;Have the police and courts been briefed yet on the application and intent of the child harbouring laws passed in this place in 2009?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Regional Development, Minister for Public Sector Management, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Consumer Affairs, Minister for Government Enterprises, Minister for Gambling</electorate>
        <startTime time="2011-09-27T16:00:00" />
        <page num="3902" />
        <text id="20110927f9844aba7db54da3a0000265">
          <timeStamp time="2011-09-27T16:00:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO (Minister for Regional Development, Minister for Public Sector Management, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Consumer Affairs, Minister for Government Enterprises, Minister for Gambling) (16:00): </by> I thank the member for her most important questions and will refer them to the Minister for Police in another place and bring back a response.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1704">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20110927f9844aba7db54da3a0000266">
          <by role="member" id="1704">The PRESIDENT:</by> I must remind honourable members that today there have been a couple of long explanations. There has also been a lot of asking for ministers to give opinions in their answers, and that is not on. Most of you have been here long enough now to know standing orders. If you do not, I remind you that you should refresh yourself of them. The Hon. Mr Wortley.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>