<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2011-07-29" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3661" />
  <endPage num="3714" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <text id="20110729a9ec5fb55d524a0cb0000306">
      <heading>Question Time</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Burnside Council</name>
      <text id="20110729a9ec5fb55d524a0cb0000307">
        <heading>BURNSIDE COUNCIL</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1820" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Leader of the Opposition</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2011-07-29">
            <name>BURNSIDE COUNCIL</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2011-07-29T14:24:00" />
        <text id="20110729a9ec5fb55d524a0cb0000308">
          <timeStamp time="2011-07-29T14:24:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1820">The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY (Leader of the Opposition) (14:24):</by>  My question is to the Leader of the Government and Minister for Regional Development. Has the minister read the draft MacPherson investigation report, excerpts of the report or a summary of the report?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Regional Development, Minister for Public Sector Management, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Consumer Affairs, Minister for Government Enterprises, Minister for Gambling</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2011-07-29">
            <name>BURNSIDE COUNCIL</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2011-07-29T14:24:00" />
        <text id="20110729a9ec5fb55d524a0cb0000309">
          <timeStamp time="2011-07-29T14:24:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO (Minister for Regional Development, Minister for Public Sector Management, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Consumer Affairs, Minister for Government Enterprises, Minister for Gambling) (14:24):</by>  It is just pathetic, Mr President. I have well and truly been on record categorically stating that I have never received the draft report. I have not read the draft report. I have not been briefed of any of the contents of the draft report. I do not know how many different ways I can say it. The real question is: how many of the honourable members opposite me have read or know the contents of the draft report? How many of them are in contempt of a suppression order? That is the real question.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>