<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2011-07-07" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3391" />
  <endPage num="3444" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Burnside Council</name>
      <text id="20110707323e00979a03412690000065">
        <heading>BURNSIDE COUNCIL</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3489" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. R.L. BROKENSHIRE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2011-07-07">
            <name>BURNSIDE COUNCIL</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2011-07-07T14:30:00" />
        <text id="20110707323e00979a03412690000066">
          <timeStamp time="2011-07-07T14:30:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3489">The Hon. R.L. BROKENSHIRE (14:30): </by> Supplementary to the minister's answer with respect to his raising the office of public integrity/ICAC, does the minister feel confident, as the minister for local government, to refer matters to the new office for public integrity/ICAC, which only has a budget of $4 million—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="2742" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. J.M.A. Lensink</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20110707323e00979a03412690000067">
          <by role="member" id="2742">The Hon. J.M.A. Lensink: </by> It's not an ICAC.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3489" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. R.L. BROKENSHIRE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20110707323e00979a03412690000068">
          <by role="member" id="3489">The Hon. R.L. BROKENSHIRE: </by> Well, they're saying it's an ICAC.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1704">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20110707323e00979a03412690000069">
          <by role="member" id="1704">The PRESIDENT:  </by>Order! No explanation.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3489">
        <name>The Hon. R.L. BROKENSHIRE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20110707323e00979a03412690000070">
          <by role="member" id="3489">The Hon. R.L. BROKENSHIRE: </by> It only has a budget of $4 million, when the Burnside investigation cost over $1.2 million.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3125" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. R.P. WORTLEY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister for State/Local Government Relations</electorate>
        <startTime time="2011-07-07T14:31:00" />
        <text id="20110707323e00979a03412690000071">
          <timeStamp time="2011-07-07T14:31:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3125">The Hon. R.P. WORTLEY (Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister for State/Local Government Relations) (14:31): </by> I thank the honourable member—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3122">
        <name>The Hon. I.K. HUNTER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20110707323e00979a03412690000072">
          <by role="member" id="3122">The Hon. I.K. HUNTER: </by> On a point of order, I may be wrong, but my understanding is that when supplementary questions are asked they are to be asked on the original answer and not on answers to supplementaries. I suggest that you rule the question out of order.</text>
        <text id="20110707323e00979a03412690000073">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="55">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1704">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20110707323e00979a03412690000074">
          <by role="member" id="1704">The PRESIDENT:  </by>Order! I have not made a ruling on the point of order yet. The Hon. Mr Hunter has a very good point. Too many people are asking supplementaries with explanation. You must direct the supplementary straight to the question. The minister can answer if he wishes.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3125">
        <name>The Hon. R.P. WORTLEY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20110707323e00979a03412690000075">
          <by role="member" id="3125">The Hon. R.P. WORTLEY: </by> The issue with the office of public integrity is the fact that, in future, instead of a very expensive inquiry going into allegations in local government, there are two things we want to do: first, I will work with the Local Government Association to ensure they have the tools to handle these little issues and the bickering between councils at the local level, instead of coming to me or the government.</text>
        <text id="20110707323e00979a03412690000076">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="55">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3125">
        <name>The Hon. R.P. WORTLEY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20110707323e00979a03412690000077">
          <by role="member" id="3125">The Hon. R.P. WORTLEY: </by> You people supported the inquiry, the investigation. Then you have complained. The funny thing about it is that you are complaining about the cost, yet you wanted me to continue the report and spend another $1 million. This is the hypocritical position you people have taken. You sit on the fence, you throw rocks while the government is trying to sort out the problems with Burnside—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3128" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. A. Bressington</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20110707323e00979a03412690000078">
          <by role="member" id="3128">The Hon. A. Bressington: </by> It's a cover up.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3125">
        <name>The Hon. R.P. WORTLEY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20110707323e00979a03412690000079">
          <by role="member" id="3125">The Hon. R.P. WORTLEY: </by> Will you please let me finish the point?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3128" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. A. Bressington</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20110707323e00979a03412690000080">
          <by role="member" id="3128">The Hon. A. Bressington: </by> No, I will not.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3125">
        <name>The Hon. R.P. WORTLEY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20110707323e00979a03412690000081">
          <by role="member" id="3125">The Hon. R.P. WORTLEY: </by> Okay, that's all right.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>