<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2011-07-06" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3319" />
  <endPage num="3394" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Burnside Council</name>
      <text id="201107069049063871684d26b0000616">
        <heading>BURNSIDE COUNCIL</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2011-07-06">
            <name>BURNSIDE COUNCIL</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2011-07-06T15:58:00" />
        <text id="201107069049063871684d26b0000617">
          <timeStamp time="2011-07-06T15:58:00" />
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (15:58): </by> I have a supplementary question arising out of the minister's answer.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1704">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201107069049063871684d26b0000618">
          <by role="member" id="1704">The PRESIDENT:</by>  The Hon. Mr Lucas has a further supplementary, and I must remind the Hon. Mr Lucas and the honourable minister that they should not be debating across the chamber.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201107069049063871684d26b0000619">
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS: </by> Hear, hear! Thank you, Mr President. Thank you for your protection. Will the minister take on notice and check with his advisers as to whether they had actually read the report before they advised him that it was going to be too difficult to 'de-strand' (whatever that means) Mr MacPherson's report?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3125" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. R.P. WORTLEY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister for State/Local Government Relations</electorate>
        <startTime time="2011-07-06T15:59:00" />
        <text id="201107069049063871684d26b0000620">
          <timeStamp time="2011-07-06T15:59:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3125">The Hon. R.P. WORTLEY (Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister for State/Local Government Relations) (15:59): </by> Mr President, I do not think it takes a Rhodes scholar to understand that, if you have done hundreds of pages of a report and the court then narrows the terms of reference down by almost, well, probably, about one-fifth, to continue on with that report without starting over again, they have to go into that report, and all the evidence taken in regard to the terms of reference are made invalid and have to be de-stranded. I will look up 'de-strand' in the dictionary and I will give you its meaning. You ought to read the court's decision and then you would understand what it means. Mr President, I have not read the report. I did not need to read the report for me to make my decision, as simple as that.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>