<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2011-06-08" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3011" />
  <endPage num="3079" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Bills</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Criminal Cases Review Commission Bill</name>
      <text id="20110608adba7c4fc8ac4bcea0000887">
        <heading>CRIMINAL CASES REVIEW COMMISSION BILL</heading>
      </text>
      <subproceeding>
        <name>Second Reading</name>
        <text id="20110608adba7c4fc8ac4bcea0000888">
          <heading>Second Reading</heading>
        </text>
        <text id="20110608adba7c4fc8ac4bcea0000889">Adjourned debate on the question:</text>
        <text id="20110608adba7c4fc8ac4bcea0000890">
          <inserted>That this bill be now read a second time.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="20110608adba7c4fc8ac4bcea0000891">to which the Hon. S.G. Wade moved to leave out all words after 'That' and insert:</text>
        <text id="20110608adba7c4fc8ac4bcea0000892">
          <inserted>the bill be withdrawn and referred to the Legislative Review Committee for inquiry and report.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20110608adba7c4fc8ac4bcea0000893">(Continued from 18 May 2011.)</text>
        <talker role="member" id="3128" kind="speech">
          <name>The Hon. A. BRESSINGTON</name>
          <house>Legislative Council</house>
          <startTime time="2011-06-08T17:50:00" />
          <text id="20110608adba7c4fc8ac4bcea0000894">
            <timeStamp time="2011-06-08T17:50:00" />
            <by role="member" id="3128">The Hon. A. BRESSINGTON (17:50):</by>  I rise to conclude my summation to the Criminal Cases Review Commission Bill. Just to refresh the council and me, the Hon. Stephen Wade has moved that the bill be referred to the Legislative Review Committee for inquiry. Earlier today I moved a motion and sought to expand that inquiry's terms of reference to include other possible means for correcting wrongful convictions and also how a national commission could (and, indeed, whether it should) operate.</text>
          <page num="3076" />
          <text id="20110608adba7c4fc8ac4bcea0000895">As I expressed last week and again earlier today, I understand the reluctance to commit the bill as it stands and given it is the first one in Australia to be introduced. For this reason, I am also more than willing to accept that this bill can be improved upon and, as such, I am supportive of its being referred for inquiry.</text>
          <text id="20110608adba7c4fc8ac4bcea0000896">Together with the expanded terms of reference I moved earlier today, I am confident that the Legislative Review Committee will thoroughly inquire into the merits of a criminal cases review commission and ultimately conclude that, as an alternative to the petition process under section 369 of the Criminal Law Consolidation Act 1953, such a commission will be a significant advancement to our criminal justice system, and I look forward to reading that particular report.</text>
          <text id="20110608adba7c4fc8ac4bcea0000897">Motion carried.</text>
        </talker>
        <talker role="member" id="3128" kind="speech">
          <name>The Hon. A. BRESSINGTON</name>
          <house>Legislative Council</house>
          <startTime time="2011-06-08T17:51:00" />
          <text id="20110608adba7c4fc8ac4bcea0000898">
            <timeStamp time="2011-06-08T17:51:00" />
            <by role="member" id="3128">The Hon. A. BRESSINGTON (17:51):</by>  I move:</text>
          <text id="20110608adba7c4fc8ac4bcea0000899">
            <inserted>That this order of the day be discharged.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="20110608adba7c4fc8ac4bcea0000900">Motion carried; bill withdrawn.</text>
        </talker>
      </subproceeding>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>