<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2011-05-04" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2665" />
  <endPage num="2729" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Government Business</name>
      <text id="20110504aced1330af874b92a0000202">
        <heading>GOVERNMENT BUSINESS</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4363" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. T.A. FRANKS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2011-05-04">
            <name>GOVERNMENT BUSINESS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2011-05-04T15:15:00" />
        <text id="20110504aced1330af874b92a0000203">
          <timeStamp time="2011-05-04T15:15:00" />
          <by role="member" id="4363">The Hon. T.A. FRANKS (15:15):</by>  I have a supplementary question arising from the original answer. Does the minister stand by her assertion that the government wanted the liquor licensing bill debated in full this week, when her staff indicated last week, when they were finally available for a briefing—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1704">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20110504aced1330af874b92a0000204">
          <by role="member" id="1704">The PRESIDENT:</by>  Order! No explanation.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4363">
        <name>The Hon. T.A. FRANKS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20110504aced1330af874b92a0000205">
          <by role="member" id="4363">The Hon. T.A. FRANKS:</by>  —that they would not be going into committee on this bill this week because of the government's own—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1704">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20110504aced1330af874b92a0000206">
          <by role="member" id="1704">The PRESIDENT:</by>  No—no explanation.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4363">
        <name>The Hon. T.A. FRANKS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20110504aced1330af874b92a0000207">
          <by role="member" id="4363">The Hon. T.A. FRANKS:</by>  —announcement that this bill had a six-week review—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1704">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20110504aced1330af874b92a0000208">
          <by role="member" id="1704">The PRESIDENT:</by>  Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4363">
        <name>The Hon. T.A. FRANKS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20110504aced1330af874b92a0000209">
          <by role="member" id="4363">The Hon. T.A. FRANKS:</by>  —which ended on Friday?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1704">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20110504aced1330af874b92a0000210">
          <by role="member" id="1704">The PRESIDENT:  </by>Order! I must say—</text>
        <text id="20110504aced1330af874b92a0000211">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="55">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1704">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20110504aced1330af874b92a0000212">
          <by role="member" id="1704">The PRESIDENT:  </by>Order! I must say that we have all been here long enough now to know how to ask a supplementary question.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. Lucas</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20110504aced1330af874b92a0000213">
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. Lucas:</by>  It was a very good supplementary.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1704">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20110504aced1330af874b92a0000214">
          <by role="member" id="1704">The PRESIDENT:</by>  It would have been, without the explanation. It might have been a supplementary question. The Hon. Mr Lucas.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>