<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2011-03-24" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2373" />
  <endPage num="2426" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>WorkCover Corporation</name>
      <text id="201103243de09a787dc2413e90000196">
        <heading>WORKCOVER CORPORATION</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2011-03-24">
            <name>WORKCOVER CORPORATION</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2011-03-24T15:04:00" />
        <text id="201103243de09a787dc2413e90000197">
          <timeStamp time="2011-03-24T15:04:00" />
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (15:04):</by>  I seek leave to make an explanation prior to directing a question to the Leader of the Government on the subject of WorkCover.</text>
        <text id="201103243de09a787dc2413e90000198">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201103243de09a787dc2413e90000199">
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS:</by>  In response to an earlier question, the minister outlined the training program Certificate IV in Personal Injury Management (Claims Management) for personal injury claims management for which WorkCover has recently paid for 25 employees, including 15 employees from Employers Mutual. On Tuesday, during debate on the training skills bill, I asked the minister: where does a consumer or student go to find out who is an accredited provider to provide a particular course? The minister said:</text>
        <page num="2384" />
        <text id="201103243de09a787dc2413e90000200">
          <inserted>...it would certainly be the view of the government that they should satisfy themselves that the provider they are being educated or trained by is properly accredited and registered. The principal way in which they can do that easily is through the National Training System—</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="201103243de09a787dc2413e90000201">which is a government endorsed and sponsored website. I then went on and asked: if a particular provider says it is providing a particular qualification and it is not accredited under the NTIS, is that an offence? The minister said that, under section 43 of the current act, it would be an offence and that the penalties for those offences would increase under clause 19 of the proposed amending act.</text>
        <text id="201103243de09a787dc2413e90000202">I followed the minister's advice and went to the government endorsed website, NTIS, to look at the Certificate IV in Personal Injury Management (Claims Management) course. What that shows is that Deakin Prime is not an accredited provider of the certificate IV claims management course. In fact, in the minister's own words when you go to this government endorsed website, it indicates that there is only currently one accredited provider of that particular course in South Australia, and that provider is not Deakin Prime.</text>
        <text id="201103243de09a787dc2413e90000203">The information provided to me is that WorkCover has paid up to $100,000 for these 25 people to undertake the Certificate IV in Personal Injury Management (Claims Management) qualification from this interstate registered training organisation. My questions are:</text>
        <text id="201103243de09a787dc2413e90000204">1.&amp;#x9;Can the minister confirm exactly how much WorkCover has paid for this course?</text>
        <text id="201103243de09a787dc2413e90000205">2.&amp;#x9;Given that 15 of those 25 employees were employed by EML, and given that EML has been paid up to $44 million in claims management fees in the last year, why did WorkCover pay for the cost of the training of EML employees, not EML?</text>
        <text id="201103243de09a787dc2413e90000206">3.&amp;#x9;Given the minister's statements in this house on Tuesday of this week, how do the minister and WorkCover justify spending up to $100,000 on a training course from an unaccredited provider of that course?</text>
        <text id="201103243de09a787dc2413e90000207">4.&amp;#x9;Does this mean that the 25 employees who were working hard for up to a six to nine-month period for that qualification from this unaccredited provider will, at the end of that period, not have a qualification recognised by the NTIS and the registered training authorities in South Australia and interstate?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3165" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. B.V. FINNIGAN</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for State/Local Government Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Gambling</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2011-03-24T15:07:00" />
        <text id="201103243de09a787dc2413e90000208">
          <timeStamp time="2011-03-24T15:07:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3165">The Hon. B.V. FINNIGAN (Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister for State/Local Government Relations, Minister for Gambling) (15:07):</by>  I thank the Hon. Mr Lucas for his question. I am not aware of the details of funding for the participants in this course. I did say that WorkCover had facilitated the introduction of the certificate, so whether it has indeed paid for all the participants going, I do not know, but I can find out that information.</text>
        <text id="201103243de09a787dc2413e90000209">I am advised that the certificate IV is a nationally recognised qualification based on agreed national industry standards. The company undertaking the delivery of the training has been involved in doing it in New South Wales and Victoria and is involved in the pilot program in South Australia. Whether or not this provider (or whoever it is under whose auspices the training is offered) appeared on the NTIS website I do not know, but I am happy to find out and bring back the information to the honourable member.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>