<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2011-03-09" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2169" />
  <endPage num="2223" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Child Protection Restraining Orders</name>
      <text id="20110309351cb304f3b74f31b0000059">
        <heading>CHILD PROTECTION RESTRAINING ORDERS</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3128" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. A. BRESSINGTON</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2011-03-09">
            <name>CHILD PROTECTION RESTRAINING ORDERS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2011-03-09T14:32:00" />
        <text id="20110309351cb304f3b74f31b0000060">
          <timeStamp time="2011-03-09T14:32:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3128">The Hon. A. BRESSINGTON (14:32):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking the minister representing the Minister for Police questions about child protection restraining orders.</text>
        <text id="20110309351cb304f3b74f31b0000061">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3128" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. A. BRESSINGTON</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20110309351cb304f3b74f31b0000062">
          <by role="member" id="3128">The Hon. A. BRESSINGTON:</by>  On 28 September last year, I asked a series of questions about the implementation of child protection restraining orders. Those questions concerned the case of a father whose 13-year-old girl had run away to live with her 18-year-old boyfriend and who was told by police that both he and they were powerless to intervene. This is despite child protection restraining orders having come into operation several months earlier. It was not until this father contacted the Leon Byner show on FIVEaa that he was informed of his right to apply for such an order, and he subsequently did so with some success. At the time I attributed the failure of the police to inform the father of these rights to the Attorney-General's Department's failure to fully brief stakeholders prior to the commencement of the act.</text>
        <text id="20110309351cb304f3b74f31b0000063">Now we have another case. A 15-year-old girl has run away from her mother's home to live with a 29-year-old drug addict. We know from the daughter that he has provided her with drugs and that they are sexually active. I repeat that he is 29, making this a criminal offence under section 29(3) of the Criminal Law Consolidation Act 1935. The desperate mother went to her local police at Golden Grove, where she was told by officers that there was nothing that the mother or the police could do.</text>
        <page num="2173" />
        <text id="20110309351cb304f3b74f31b0000064">It is alleged that the police informed the daughter that she was free to leave home and that her mother could not stop her. The police then drove this young girl to a phone box outside a supermarket, in the middle of the night, where she called the 29-year-old to collect her. Again, this mother was only informed of child protection restraining orders after calling radio station FIVEaa. My questions to the minister are:</text>
        <text id="20110309351cb304f3b74f31b0000065">1.&amp;#x9;Does the minister consider the actions of the police officers in telling the daughter that her mother was powerless to prevent her from running away and then taking the girl from the mother's home to a phone box to call this man (who they were told was providing her with illicit drugs and sleeping with her) appropriate?</text>
        <text id="20110309351cb304f3b74f31b0000066">2.&amp;#x9;Does the minister concede that this parliament's intent of empowering parents to protect teenage runaways is being undermined by what is clearly police reluctance to acknowledge the existence of parental rights?</text>
        <text id="20110309351cb304f3b74f31b0000067">3.&amp;#x9;Has a general order been issued informing front-line officers of their powers to initiate a child protection restraining order and of their responsibilities to inform parents with runaway teens of their right to do so?</text>
        <text id="20110309351cb304f3b74f31b0000068">4.&amp;#x9;Given that parents are able to initiate a child protection restraining order without police cooperation, will the government please do a public education campaign to inform parents of their rights?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3165" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. B.V. FINNIGAN</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister for State/Local Government Relations, Minister for Gambling</electorate>
        <startTime time="2011-03-09T14:35:00" />
        <text id="20110309351cb304f3b74f31b0000069">
          <timeStamp time="2011-03-09T14:35:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3165">The Hon. B.V. FINNIGAN (Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister for State/Local Government Relations, Minister for Gambling) (14:35):</by>  In relation to those specific cases, I will refer that matter to my colleague in the other place, the Minister for Police, and bring back a response. What I will say is that this government certainly does support our police. We have invested record funding in providing them with the resources to do their job, and we have record numbers of sworn police officers in the state, and more to come, unlike some of the honourable members of the opposition, who seem to be running a bit of a campaign against police, calling into question their integrity and refusing to take their advice in relation to matters pertaining to their work.</text>
        <text id="20110309351cb304f3b74f31b0000070">The government is very committed to ensuring that children are able to live in a safe environment, and there are a number of legislative tools in that regard, as well as the work that our police and others do, such as the Department for Families and Communities. That is highlighted by further changes to domestic violence legislation, for example, which this government has made in recent times. Certainly, I believe the government is committed to ensuring that children are safe and that, wherever it is necessary, the tools are in place to ensure that children are kept in a safe environment.</text>
        <text id="20110309351cb304f3b74f31b0000071">I know the police take seriously any new responsibility or change in responsibility as a result of legislative changes and undergo a thorough training program in relation to them. However, in relation to the specific details, I will obtain further information.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>