<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2011-02-23" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2019" />
  <endPage num="2075" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Burnside Council</name>
      <text id="20110223fd27af5c20404a6aa0000049">
        <heading>BURNSIDE COUNCIL</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3164" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2011-02-23">
            <name>BURNSIDE COUNCIL</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2011-02-23T14:30:00" />
        <text id="20110223fd27af5c20404a6aa0000050">
          <timeStamp time="2011-02-23T14:30:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. WADE (14:30):</by>  I have a supplementary question arising from the answer. If the minister suggests that it is inappropriate for an investigation to proceed while court matters are proceeding, why was work going on up until 4 February and what was the work related to?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3165" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. B.V. FINNIGAN</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister for State/Local Government Relations, Minister for Gambling</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2011-02-23">
            <name>BURNSIDE COUNCIL</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2011-02-23T14:30:00" />
        <text id="20110223fd27af5c20404a6aa0000051">
          <timeStamp time="2011-02-23T14:30:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3165">The Hon. B.V. FINNIGAN (Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister for State/Local Government Relations, Minister for Gambling) (14:30):</by>  What I said was that the government decided that, in light of the court action that was proceeding, it would be most appropriate to cease the investigation. I did not say that it was illegal in some way. The principal reason why it was appropriate for the government to suspend the work of Mr MacPherson was so that we can await to see what the outcome of the case will be and decide the best course of action following whatever decision the court makes. Obviously, the investigation was wide ranging—</text>
        <text id="20110223fd27af5c20404a6aa0000052">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="62">The Hon. S.G. Wade interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3165" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. B.V. FINNIGAN</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20110223fd27af5c20404a6aa0000053">
          <by role="member" id="3165">The Hon. B.V. FINNIGAN:</by>  The honourable member is aware of the terms of reference. There are quite a number—</text>
        <text id="20110223fd27af5c20404a6aa0000054">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="62">The Hon. S.G. Wade interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1704">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20110223fd27af5c20404a6aa0000055">
          <by role="member" id="1704">The PRESIDENT:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3165">
        <name>The Hon. B.V. FINNIGAN</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20110223fd27af5c20404a6aa0000056">
          <by role="member" id="3165">The Hon. B.V. FINNIGAN:</by>  —of matters that are part of the investigation; not all of them are subject to what the court case is about. What the government is doing is ensuring that we are able to make best use of what the investigation has done to date. The only way we can do that is to await the outcome of the court decision, or at least to ensure that there is some finality to what is happening in relation to the court case, and then the government will be in a better position to decide how to proceed.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>