<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2011-02-22" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1989" />
  <endPage num="2018" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Attorney-General's Department</name>
      <text id="20110222a0650033312240f9b0000059">
        <heading>ATTORNEY-GENERAL'S DEPARTMENT</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="2742" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2011-02-22">
            <name>ATTORNEY-GENERAL'S DEPARTMENT</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2011-02-22T14:31:00" />
        <text id="20110222a0650033312240f9b0000060">
          <timeStamp time="2011-02-22T14:31:00" />
          <by role="member" id="2742">The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK (14:31):</by>  Thank you, Mr President. I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking the Minister for Consumer Affairs a question about amalgamation of business units within the Attorney-General's Department.</text>
        <text id="20110222a0650033312240f9b0000061">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="2742" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20110222a0650033312240f9b0000062">
          <by role="member" id="2742">The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK:</by>  In the most recent budget, the amalgamation of a number of business units was announced within the Attorney-General's Department, including OCBA and the Office of the Liquor and Gambling Commissioner, which we are told will amount to a saving for the department of $23.3 million over four years. I have been contacted by concerned people in industry, and they have voiced specific concerns that this move will result in loss of expertise in certain areas, leading to poorer licensing and policing outcomes. My questions are:</text>
        <text id="20110222a0650033312240f9b0000063">1.&amp;#x9;What consultation, if any, was conducted with industry prior to the announcement?</text>
        <text id="20110222a0650033312240f9b0000064">2.&amp;#x9;Given that the budget outlined that savings will occur in this current financial year, when will the process of amalgamation begin?</text>
        <text id="20110222a0650033312240f9b0000065">3.&amp;#x9;What commitments has the minister provided to industry to ease these concerns?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Regional Development, Minister for Public Sector Management, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Consumer Affairs, Minister for Government Enterprises</electorate>
        <startTime time="2011-02-22T14:32:00" />
        <page num="1992" />
        <text id="20110222a0650033312240f9b0000066">
          <timeStamp time="2011-02-22T14:32:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO (Minister for Regional Development, Minister for Public Sector Management, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Consumer Affairs, Minister for Government Enterprises) (14:32):</by>  I thank the honourable member for her most important questions. The restructuring of the Attorney-General's Department was a budget savings initiative, which was put forward in light of our need to respond to the global economic crisis and to bring our budget back on line and to ensure that we had a long-term, sustainable approach to our budget, and that meant taking the hard decisions—and we made many of them—to bring our spending into check. The restructure of the AGD was one of those initiatives, and it went through those budgetary processes, along with other budget savings initiatives that were put forward and considered, and this one was finally adopted.</text>
        <text id="20110222a0650033312240f9b0000067">However, there is good news in this story—it is not all bad news—and I am very pleased to talk about this issue here today. As we know, the Attorney-General's Department is undergoing significant change and reform, and one of the main drivers has been the increase in the size of the department over recent years, through the machinery of government changes. To maximise organisational strengths and address current structural limitations, the majority of the department's existing business units are being harmonised within the areas of organisational performance, building communities, and business and consumer services.</text>
        <text id="20110222a0650033312240f9b0000068">Each division, to be headed by a deputy chief executive, will lead the formation of a new divisional operating model. I have been advised that this reform will realise economies of skill and scale and seek to improve the value to the community and also to stakeholders. So, core capabilities will be brought together in centres of expertise and made available across the department to improve services to the community, and we believe that the public will, in fact, benefit by some of these changes.</text>
        <text id="20110222a0650033312240f9b0000069">The Consumer and Business Services division will be formed by the merger of the Office of Consumer and Business Affairs and the Office of the Liquor and Gambling Commissioner. The position of Deputy Chief Executive for Consumer and Business Services has been filled by Mr Paul White, who has commenced in that role. He is an extremely competent and professional man. We have had feedback from industry with high praise for the way that this gentleman operates—high praise, indeed. I think he is very well regarded in this state by all major industry stakeholders.</text>
        <text id="20110222a0650033312240f9b0000070">A project change team has been established to manage the change program; staff consultation has commenced; and ongoing staff and stakeholder consultation will occur throughout 2011. The roles and functions of the Office of the Liquor and Gambling Commissioner and the Office of Consumer and Business Affairs will continue providing relevant, vital and also contemporary services in line with the community's needs and expectations during the change process and beyond. My understanding is that the harmonisation will result in the aggregation and streamlining of processes and functions common to both organisations.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>