<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2010-11-24" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1593" />
  <endPage num="1789" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Population Targets</name>
      <text id="2010112485833ad02fd94c73a0002214">
        <heading>POPULATION TARGETS</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3489" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. R.L. BROKENSHIRE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2010-11-24">
            <name>POPULATION TARGETS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2010-11-24T14:54:00" />
        <text id="2010112485833ad02fd94c73a0002215">
          <timeStamp time="2010-11-24T14:54:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3489">The Hon. R.L. BROKENSHIRE (14:54):</by>  I have a supplementary question. Given that the Leader of Government Business has advised the house that there will be a lower population growth than predicted in the 30-year plan period, will he agree to a moratorium with the community on stages 1, 2 and 3, or at least of stages 2 and 3, of the Seaford Heights development, given that there will not be the urgency for its completion?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning, Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister Assisting the Premier in Public Sector Management</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2010-11-24">
            <name>POPULATION TARGETS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2010-11-24T14:54:00" />
        <text id="2010112485833ad02fd94c73a0002216">
          <timeStamp time="2010-11-24T14:54:00" />
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY (Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning, Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister Assisting the Premier in Public Sector Management) (14:54):</by>  I have not agreed that there will necessarily be a lower population growth over 30 years. What I have said we do get, from year to year, is some fluctuation in population growth. In the previous 12 months, there may well have been some reduction in the population growth, which could be due to commonwealth policies on immigration and so on.</text>
        <text id="2010112485833ad02fd94c73a0002217">They may well be temporary measures. We could find that, next year or the year after, if the world economy recovers or conditions change, our population growth does resume. I am certainly not conceding that in 30 years' time we will necessarily have a lesser number of people than in the population target. In any case, doesn't it make sense that we should plan 30 years ahead? As I said, if our population growth is a bit lower, and it takes 35 or 40 years, isn't it still a sensible thing to plan in advance for where that population growth should be located? Finally, in relation to the latter stages, I think I have addressed the issue of Seaford Heights and the staging adequately enough in previous questions.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>