<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2010-11-23" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1551" />
  <endPage num="1593" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Burnside Council</name>
      <text id="20101123c11cd210c911406cb0000154">
        <heading>BURNSIDE COUNCIL</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3164" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2010-11-23">
            <name>BURNSIDE COUNCIL</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2010-11-23T14:45:00" />
        <text id="20101123c11cd210c911406cb0000155">
          <timeStamp time="2010-11-23T14:45:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. WADE (14:45): </by> As a supplementary: could the minister advise the house whether she or the government is subject to an injunction on this matter or whether she or the government has given an undertaking to the court?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for State/Local Government Relations, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Consumer Affairs, Minister for Government Enterprises, Minister for the City of Adelaide</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2010-11-23">
            <name>BURNSIDE COUNCIL</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2010-11-23T14:45:00" />
        <page num="1557" />
        <text id="20101123c11cd210c911406cb0000156">
          <timeStamp time="2010-11-23T14:45:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO (Minister for State/Local Government Relations, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Consumer Affairs, Minister for Government Enterprises, Minister for the City of Adelaide) (14:45): </by> What a lazy opposition! What a lazy, lazy, pathetic opposition. He just goes from worse to worse. He is just shooting himself in the foot. He should just sit there and button up. It is pathetic. Is he so lazy that he has not even bothered to find out what is going on? This matter has been before the court for weeks and weeks and weeks.</text>
        <text id="20101123c11cd210c911406cb0000157">Is he so lazy that he has not even bothered to inform himself of the commitment and the undertaking the government has given in relation to the draft report? Is he so lazy that he is not aware of the undertaking that this government has given? How pathetic! Is the honourable member really suggesting that, after giving an undertaking to the court in response to the plaintiffs' request, we should defy that undertaking? Is he so irresponsible and disrespectful that he is suggesting that I defy that undertaking given to the court? That is just outrageous. It is totally irresponsible, totally disrespectful and absolutely disdainful of the court.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>