<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2010-11-09" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1343" />
  <endPage num="1380" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Desalination Plant</name>
      <text id="20101109be35b9354fb747e7a0000111">
        <heading>DESALINATION PLANT</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3130" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. M. PARNELL</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2010-11-09">
            <name>DESALINATION PLANT</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2010-11-09T14:34:00" />
        <text id="20101109be35b9354fb747e7a0000112">
          <timeStamp time="2010-11-09T14:34:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3130">The Hon. M. PARNELL (14:34):</by>  I have a supplementary question. Why wasn't the licensing authority for those sewerage works, namely the Environment Protection Authority, consulted before the government settled on the location of Port Stanvac for the desalination plant?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning, Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister Assisting the Premier in Public Sector Management</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2010-11-09">
            <name>DESALINATION PLANT</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2010-11-09T14:35:00" />
        <text id="20101109be35b9354fb747e7a0000113">
          <timeStamp time="2010-11-09T14:35:00" />
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY (Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning, Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister Assisting the Premier in Public Sector Management) (14:35):</by>  The EPA was of course involved during the consideration of the environmental impact statement for the sewerage plant.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3130" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. M. Parnell</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20101109be35b9354fb747e7a0000114">
          <by role="member" id="3130">The Hon. M. Parnell:</by>  Before you decided the location, not afterwards.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1704">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20101109be35b9354fb747e7a0000115">
          <by role="member" id="1704">The PRESIDENT:</by>  Order! The Hon. Mr Parnell will cease interjecting.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20101109be35b9354fb747e7a0000116">
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY:</by>  You actually have to sort of start somewhere. There were a couple of sites, as I understand it. It was a long time ago now since this was considered.</text>
        <text id="20101109be35b9354fb747e7a0000117">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="52">The Hon. D.W. Ridgway interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20101109be35b9354fb747e7a0000118">
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY:</by>  Well, it appears that you don't want to build it now either. My understanding was that several sites were looked at. There are not exactly a huge number of sites on which one could put an operation of this scale along the Adelaide coast. There are not that many sites available, and I am sure wherever we put it—if it had been up north on the mangroves or something up there—the Hon. Mr Parnell would have objected to that if we had used such a site.</text>
        <text id="20101109be35b9354fb747e7a0000119">Clearly, it makes more sense to have the desalination plant closer to the open water and near deep water. The Port Stanvac site was formerly zoned industrial. It has deep water. It was a port because it had fairly deep water relatively close to the shore which, of course, is important in relation to the operation of it.</text>
        <text id="20101109be35b9354fb747e7a0000120">Given that it had sufficient land available with buffers from residential areas it was, I would have thought, a pretty obvious site. I challenge anyone to suggest a better site for it in relation to its proximity to the Adelaide metropolitan area. The fact is the EPA, of course, have been involved in consideration of the environmental impact statement.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>