<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2010-10-26" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1093" />
  <endPage num="1162" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>30-Year Plan for Greater Adelaide</name>
      <page num="1109" />
      <text id="20101026be3312ea750b46c590000258">
        <heading>30-YEAR PLAN FOR GREATER ADELAIDE</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3126" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. D.G.E. HOOD</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2010-10-26">
            <name>30-YEAR PLAN FOR GREATER ADELAIDE</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2010-10-26T15:29:00" />
        <text id="20101026be3312ea750b46c590000259">
          <timeStamp time="2010-10-26T15:29:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3126">The Hon. D.G.E. HOOD (15:29): </by> I have a further supplementary question, Mr President. Does the minister envisage the expansion of light rail along those corridors such as Prospect Road and Unley Road? Is that part of the government's vision?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning, Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister Assisting the Premier in Public Sector Management</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2010-10-26">
            <name>30-YEAR PLAN FOR GREATER ADELAIDE</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2010-10-26T15:30:00" />
        <text id="20101026be3312ea750b46c590000260">
          <timeStamp time="2010-10-26T15:30:00" />
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY (Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning, Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister Assisting the Premier in Public Sector Management) (15:30): </by> Obviously, the government is, at present, involved in a very heavy investment project. When you are talking about $2 billion on rail, obviously our capital expenditure is pretty much consumed for the next few years. Clearly, there will be a role in the future for further expansion of the tram network, and obviously there are a number of streets one could name that would be suitable for that. The honourable member has suggested a couple. You could probably throw in The Parade and a few others that might well be worth looking at.</text>
        <text id="20101026be3312ea750b46c590000261">Obviously, given the government's forward capital commitment to the electrification of railways and the expansion of the rail line down to Seaford, that program will cost several billion dollars and, clearly, will be the priority and will take most of the available funding for the next few years. One would expect that, once that is completed, the other major transport issues that are identified in the 30-year plan will come into government planning. As I said, right now, of course, we have a large number of projects—unprecedented in scale in this state—that will take the available funding. We certainly look forward to that happening in the future.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>