<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2010-10-26" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1093" />
  <endPage num="1162" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>30-Year Plan for Greater Adelaide</name>
      <text id="201010265db4b13d18ae477580000252">
        <heading>30-YEAR PLAN FOR GREATER ADELAIDE</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3126" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. D.G.E. HOOD</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2010-10-26">
            <name>30-YEAR PLAN FOR GREATER ADELAIDE</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2010-10-26T15:27:00" />
        <text id="201010265db4b13d18ae477580000253">
          <timeStamp time="2010-10-26T15:27:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3126">The Hon. D.G.E. HOOD (15:27): </by> As a supplementary question—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1704">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201010265db4b13d18ae477580000254">
          <by role="member" id="1704">The PRESIDENT:</by>  From the answer, of course?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3126">
        <name>The Hon. D.G.E. HOOD</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201010265db4b13d18ae477580000255">
          <by role="member" id="3126">The Hon. D.G.E. HOOD: </by> Thank you. Would the minister outline how the government intends to allay the concerns of residents whose properties will abut the corridors where the medium-rise buildings will be built? What measures will the government take in order to avoid their yards being overlooked, etc.?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning, Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister Assisting the Premier in Public Sector Management</electorate>
        <startTime time="2010-10-26T15:27:00" />
        <text id="201010265db4b13d18ae477580000256">
          <timeStamp time="2010-10-26T15:27:00" />
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY (Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning, Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister Assisting the Premier in Public Sector Management) (15:27): </by> I answered a question about this a week or so ago. I think that the deputy leader might have asked a question about a similar matter in relation to Prospect. I think I referred in my answer then to the visit we made to the suburb of Arlington in Washington, where one of the best examples I have ever seen involves a transition of less than 100 metres from five storeys (and in some cases even more) down into a green suburb. It was almost unnoticeable.</text>
        <text id="201010265db4b13d18ae477580000257">Good planning can enable that transition to be made. Obviously, it will depend on the particular site. Clearly, each suburb is different, but that is what requires good planning. It is important that, when we do the structure planning and it goes into the development plan, we have appropriate policy conditions to ensure that this transition from the high-rise on the corridor down into the suburbs is done well and in a way that not only creates no nuisance to people but also is attractive. I know that it can be done. I have seen it in a number of developments overseas, and it is important that we achieve that here. How it will be done, as I said, is through the right development plan.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>