<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2010-10-14" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1051" />
  <endPage num="1094" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Liquor Licensing</name>
      <text id="2010101406df18acb8934dbea0000078">
        <heading>LIQUOR LICENSING</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="2742" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2010-10-14">
            <name>LIQUOR LICENSING</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2010-10-14T14:34:00" />
        <text id="2010101406df18acb8934dbea0000079">
          <timeStamp time="2010-10-14T14:34:00" />
          <by role="member" id="2742">The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK (14:34):</by>  My questions are for the Minister for Consumer Affairs on the subject of liquor licensing:</text>
        <text id="2010101406df18acb8934dbea0000080">1.&amp;#x9;How many licensed premises in South Australia have not had an inspection in the last three years?</text>
        <text id="2010101406df18acb8934dbea0000081">2.&amp;#x9;How long does the average inspection take?</text>
        <text id="2010101406df18acb8934dbea0000082">3.&amp;#x9;How many fines were issued, for what types of offences and how many in each category?</text>
        <text id="2010101406df18acb8934dbea0000083">4.&amp;#x9;How many prosecutions were recorded, for what types of offences and how many in each category?</text>
        <text id="2010101406df18acb8934dbea0000084">5.&amp;#x9;What action was taken as a result of prosecutions?</text>
        <text id="2010101406df18acb8934dbea0000085">6.&amp;#x9;What has been the impact of the initiative from the 2009-10 budget of conducting 400 additional priority 1 inspections?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for State/Local Government Relations, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Consumer Affairs, Minister for Government Enterprises, Minister for the City of Adelaide</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2010-10-14">
            <name>LIQUOR LICENSING</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2010-10-14T14:35:00" />
        <page num="1055" />
        <text id="2010101406df18acb8934dbea0000086">
          <timeStamp time="2010-10-14T14:35:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO (Minister for State/Local Government Relations, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Consumer Affairs, Minister for Government Enterprises, Minister for the City of Adelaide) (14:35):</by>  I thank the honourable member for her important questions. The Office of the Liquor and Gambling Commissioner inspectors are responsible for the physical inspection of our licensed premises, and that is about ensuring compliance with the Liquor Licensing Act and other conditions of the licence as well. Inspectors also prepare reports for the licensing authority on new applications and applications which have the potential to impact on the local community.</text>
        <text id="2010101406df18acb8934dbea0000087">The enforcement of the act is assisted by the police, and to this end SAPOL has a dedicated licensing enforcement branch. SAPOL also has dedicated drug action sergeants in all local service areas with responsibility for alcohol and drug management issues. For example, police have primary responsibility for policing matters such as minors, the service of intoxicated people, overcrowding, trading hours and other behavioural issues.</text>
        <text id="2010101406df18acb8934dbea0000088">Licensed premises total approximately 5,600. They are assessed annually on a risk associated with three different categories to determine the frequency of their inspections. Priority 1 venues are inspected every 12 months; priority 2 are inspected every two years; and priority 3 are inspected every three years. The licensed premises throughout the state are inspected on a regular basis and premises considered high risk are flagged priority 1; those considered medium risk are flagged as priority 2; and those that are flagged as low risk are considered priority 3.</text>
        <text id="2010101406df18acb8934dbea0000089">The estimated results for visits for 2009-10 are: priority 1, 1,364; priority 2, 1,390; and priority 3, 471. The estimated result for 2009-10 in priority 1 premises was 1,364 inspections, as I said. There was a minor variance between that and the target that was established. In terms of the details in relation to the other questions that the honourable member asked, I am happy to take those on notice and bring back a response.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>