<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2010-10-14" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1051" />
  <endPage num="1094" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Cemetery Regulations</name>
      <text id="20101014d7a0d5e40af5401e80000143">
        <heading>CEMETERY REGULATIONS</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3489" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. R.L. BROKENSHIRE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2010-10-14">
            <name>CEMETERY REGULATIONS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2010-10-14T14:57:00" />
        <text id="20101014d7a0d5e40af5401e80000144">
          <timeStamp time="2010-10-14T14:57:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3489">The Hon. R.L. BROKENSHIRE (14:57): </by> By way of supplementary question, will the minister advise how many times cemetery managers and owners have taken people to court, and how will they police these regulations?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for State/Local Government Relations, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Consumer Affairs, Minister for Government Enterprises, Minister for the City of Adelaide</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2010-10-14">
            <name>CEMETERY REGULATIONS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2010-10-14T14:57:00" />
        <text id="20101014d7a0d5e40af5401e80000145">
          <timeStamp time="2010-10-14T14:57:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO (Minister for State/Local Government Relations, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Consumer Affairs, Minister for Government Enterprises, Minister for the City of Adelaide) (14:57): </by> As I said in my answer, these offences have been rarely enforced in the past. Nevertheless, the upgrading of the regulations was an opportunity, as they had not been changed for some time, to improve them and we did it in extensive consultation with the industry.</text>
        <text id="20101014d7a0d5e40af5401e80000146">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="4">The Hon. A. Bressington interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20101014d7a0d5e40af5401e80000147">
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO: </by> It was extensive. The honourable member questions how extensive the consultation was. It is absolutely outrageous. She does not know what she is talking about. She is making comments in this place and she has no idea what she is talking about in terms of the extensive consultation that occurred in regard to these regulations. We even have the LGA supporting these announced changes. The Cemeteries Authority supported these regulations, so it is in line with the views of the industry. That is responsible government.</text>
        <page num="1060" />
        <text id="20101014d7a0d5e40af5401e80000148">The second question, if I recall, was how these matters would be enforced. It would depend on the arrangements between the cemetery authority and local councils. Different cemeteries have different arrangements in place. I have been advised that an authorised officer would have the powers to initiate an expiation, and cemetery authority people also could be delegated that responsibility, as could local council officers.</text>
        <text id="20101014d7a0d5e40af5401e80000149">There are different types of arrangements in place, and it would depend on where that delegated authority lay. It is no different to the current arrangements. These same authorised officers, I have been advised, are those who are responsible for enforcing breaches in the current parking and driving offences in cemeteries.</text>
        <text id="20101014d7a0d5e40af5401e80000150">So, I have been advised that there is no difference to the enforcement or the offence except that, instead of them all necessarily having to go off to court and face a fine of $200, they can be expiated, and I said the range of fees is $21 or $50 respectively, for parking and driving offences.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>