<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2010-09-30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1007" />
  <endPage num="1051" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Burnside Council</name>
      <text id="201009304b72c5326489486090000070">
        <heading>BURNSIDE COUNCIL</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3164" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2010-09-30">
            <name>BURNSIDE COUNCIL</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2010-09-30T14:34:00" />
        <text id="201009304b72c5326489486090000071">
          <timeStamp time="2010-09-30T14:34:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. WADE (14:34):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking questions of the Minister for State/Local Government Relations relating to Burnside council.</text>
        <text id="201009304b72c5326489486090000072">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3164" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201009304b72c5326489486090000073">
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. WADE:</by>  This week a candidate for election to the Burnside council received advice that the government has refused the candidate's request to be released from a confidentiality agreement relating to the draft report of the investigation into the Burnside council. My questions are:</text>
        <text id="201009304b72c5326489486090000074">1.&amp;#x9;How does the government justify the government's refusal, given the need for candidates to be able to maintain their reputation in an election campaign?</text>
        <page num="1011" />
        <text id="201009304b72c5326489486090000075">2.&amp;#x9;As an alternative, will the government consider crown law and candidates negotiating statements of agreed facts so that Burnside electors can have as much information as possible before they vote?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for State/Local Government Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Status of Women</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Consumer Affairs</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Government Enterprises</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the City of Adelaide</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2010-09-30T14:35:00" />
        <text id="201009304b72c5326489486090000076">
          <timeStamp time="2010-09-30T14:35:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO (Minister for State/Local Government Relations, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Consumer Affairs, Minister for Government Enterprises, Minister for the City of Adelaide) (14:35):</by>  An outrageous proposition! The answers are quite straightforward, really. In terms of the request for release from the confidentiality agreement, I received advice in relation to that and based this decision on that advice, and the advice was that, no, it was inadvisable to do so. In relation to the second outrageous proposition, no.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>