<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2010-09-29" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="943" />
  <endPage num="1008" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Islington Development Plan Amendment</name>
      <text id="2010092998d016899a734af2a0000063">
        <heading>ISLINGTON DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3130" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. M. PARNELL</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2010-09-29">
            <name>ISLINGTON DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2010-09-29T14:35:00" />
        <text id="2010092998d016899a734af2a0000064">
          <timeStamp time="2010-09-29T14:35:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3130">The Hon. M. PARNELL (14:35):</by>  I have a supplementary question arising from the answer. Can the minister confirm that 'interim operation' means that any changes made to the development plan after public consultation will not apply to any development applications that are lodged now, during the interim operation period?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning, Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister Assisting the Premier in Public Sector Management</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2010-09-29">
            <name>ISLINGTON DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2010-09-29T14:35:00" />
        <page num="947" />
        <text id="2010092998d016899a734af2a0000065">
          <timeStamp time="2010-09-29T14:35:00" />
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY (Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning, Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister Assisting the Premier in Public Sector Management) (14:35):</by>  That is correct. I am sure that given, as I said, the area is currently zoned as general industry it would certainly be inappropriate if one did not have interim operation if there are development applications lodged now. If an application had been made and if it was complying with general industry, it would obviously be assessed under that zoning, and I am sure that the people of Kilburn would not want another foundry or, even it that was not permitted, some other like activity within that region. Obviously, given the activity taking place east of Churchill Road in that area involving the Housing SA redevelopment, we need to change the mix, and that is one of the important reasons for interim operation in relation to this matter.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>