<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2010-09-28" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="909" />
  <endPage num="943" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <text id="20100928d36e2fcfedc34573b0000046">
      <heading>Question Time</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Independent Commission Against Corruption</name>
      <text id="20100928d36e2fcfedc34573b0000047">
        <heading>INDEPENDENT COMMISSION AGAINST CORRUPTION</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1820" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2010-09-28">
            <name>INDEPENDENT COMMISSION AGAINST CORRUPTION</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2010-09-28T14:29:00" />
        <text id="20100928d36e2fcfedc34573b0000048">
          <timeStamp time="2010-09-28T14:29:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1820">The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY (Leader of the Opposition) (14:29):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking the Leader of the Government a question about an independent commission against corruption.</text>
        <text id="20100928d36e2fcfedc34573b0000049">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1820" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20100928d36e2fcfedc34573b0000050">
          <by role="member" id="1820">The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY:</by>  The ALP has long argued that South Australia does not need an independent commission against corruption because we already have, among others, the Police Complaints Authority. The Ombudsman does not have the powers to investigate complaints against police of alleged corruption; the Police Complaints Authority refers those matters to SAPOL's Anti-Corruption Branch.</text>
        <text id="20100928d36e2fcfedc34573b0000051">Eminent lawyers, including corruption fighters in South Australia and other states, including former Labor premiers Peter Beattie and Bob Carr, and also independent anti-crime commissioners in states which have them, all urge the establishment of an ICAC in South Australia. Even the State Coroner says that the secrecy provisions in the Police Complaints Act are too restrictive. They say that the Police Complaints Authority should be disbanded and replaced with a more transparent system of investigation, through an independent commission. One of the criticisms is that complaints of corruption against police eventuate (via the Police Complaints Authority) in the Anti-Corruption Branch, which effectively is police investigating police.</text>
        <page num="911" />
        <text id="20100928d36e2fcfedc34573b0000052">The Leader of the Government may have heard a fascinating midnight phone call made by the former attorney-general Michael Atkinson to FIVEaa<term></term>this week, in which he lambasted the Legal Practitioners Conduct Board. He said that having lawyers investigate the conduct of lawyers is like Caesar judging Caesar. My question is: now that even the previous attorney-general sees the folly of Caesar judging Caesar, when will the government scrap the internal Police Anti-Corruption Branch and the involvement of the Police Complaints Authority in complaints of alleged police corruption and replace them with an independent commission against corruption?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Mineral Resources Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Urban Development and Planning</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister Assisting the Premier in Public Sector Management</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2010-09-28T14:31:00" />
        <text id="20100928d36e2fcfedc34573b0000053">
          <timeStamp time="2010-09-28T14:31:00" />
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY (Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning, Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister Assisting the Premier in Public Sector Management) (14:31): </by> The first point I make is that the Police Complaints Authority is headed by a lawyer, as I understand it, and not headed by a member of the police force. It is an independent body that does it but, in relation to the broader issue of the roles of these authorities, the leader would be well aware that the Attorney-General is currently investigating such arrangements, and I am sure we will have a report fairly soon.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>