<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2010-09-16" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="861" />
  <endPage num="910" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Bills</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Motor Vehicles (Miscellaneous) Amendment Bill</name>
      <text id="20100916f85fa57c53d0434580000056">
        <heading>MOTOR VEHICLES (MISCELLANEOUS) AMENDMENT BILL</heading>
      </text>
      <subproceeding>
        <name>Second Reading</name>
        <text id="20100916f85fa57c53d0434580000057">
          <heading>Second Reading</heading>
        </text>
        <page num="866" />
        <text id="20100916f85fa57c53d0434580000058">Adjourned debate on second reading.</text>
        <text id="20100916f85fa57c53d0434580000059">(Continued from 21 July 2010.)</text>
        <talker role="member" id="1820" kind="speech">
          <name>The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY</name>
          <house>Legislative Council</house>
          <electorate id="">Leader of the Opposition</electorate>
          <startTime time="2010-09-16T11:28:00" />
          <text id="20100916f85fa57c53d0434580000060">
            <timeStamp time="2010-09-16T11:28:00" />
            <by role="member" id="1820">The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY (Leader of the Opposition) (11:28):</by>  I rise on behalf of the opposition to speak to this bill, the main purpose of which is to correct some errors, omissions and anomalies from earlier amendment bills. I will make a reasonably brief contribution, given that it is quite a simple bill and that it is non-contentious. The amendment of the act needs to occur in order that the government's original motor vehicle legislation has the intended effect. The amendments relate to the graduated licensing scheme, regulation-making powers for the high powered vehicle restriction scheme, and the drug and alcohol dependency assessments.</text>
          <text id="20100916f85fa57c53d0434580000061">Disregarding a few minor drafting issues, which have been tied up, the areas of some significance are as follows. The amendment of section 79B effectively replaces a scheme that the court had previously administered. We support the objective of relieving the courts from being involved in certain matters. First, a licence applicant who has had convictions or expiations relating to drugs and alcohol must undergo a substance dependency assessment. Secondly, I point out that drug dependency is met with a licence refusal while alcohol dependency requires a licence subject to the alcohol interlock scheme conditions.</text>
          <text id="20100916f85fa57c53d0434580000062">Further, section 47J of the Road Traffic Act lists the circumstances requiring the applicant to undergo an assessment and, where it was previously court based, this has now been transferred to the Registrar of Motor Vehicles. The move makes sense in administrative and resource terms. The bill also deletes an anomaly regarding a timing aspect. The bill proposes to use the date of committing the latest offence instead of using the date of application for a licence. In doing so, we avoid the potential abuse by an applicant to defer the date of application to avoid undergoing a dependency assessment.</text>
          <text id="20100916f85fa57c53d0434580000063">The next amendment to mention relates to the bill of last year which dealt with particular licence class holders operating high-powered vehicles. Under that legislation, a P-plater can apply for an exemption to be able to operate such a vehicle. Section 81AB of the Motor Vehicles Act refers to situations where probationary licence conditions should be placed on a driver. The Graduated Licensing Scheme Act clarified those circumstances.</text>
          <text id="20100916f85fa57c53d0434580000064">As I understand it, the amendments to section 81AB in the Graduated Licensing Scheme Act were significant and reasonably complex and, as such, there was a cross-referencing omission which meant that a disqualified P-plater may return to driving, after an appeals process, to non-probationary conditions. This was obviously not the intent of the legislation and certainly needs to be tidied up.</text>
          <text id="20100916f85fa57c53d0434580000065">The opposition is happy to support this bill but is disappointed that the amendments from last year had to be revisited so quickly and, again, is an example of a government that has passed its use-by date and simply cannot get its act together and get things right. However, we are happy to correct it today.</text>
        </talker>
        <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="speech">
          <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
          <house>Legislative Council</house>
          <electorate id="">Minister for State/Local Government Relations, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Consumer Affairs, Minister for Government Enterprises, Minister for the City of Adelaide</electorate>
          <startTime time="2010-09-16T11:30:00" />
          <text id="20100916f85fa57c53d0434580000066">
            <timeStamp time="2010-09-16T11:30:00" />
            <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO (Minister for State/Local Government Relations, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Consumer Affairs, Minister for Government Enterprises, Minister for the City of Adelaide) (11:30):</by>  I thank the honourable member for his contribution and his support for this bill. I have also managed to speak briefly to most of the minor parties and Independents, who have also expressed support for this bill, and I thank them for their cooperation. This is, indeed, a very simple bill. It contains a number of very minor technical amendments that are aimed at improving the operations of the Motor Vehicle Act 1959. It is a simple bill and a non-contentious bill and, therefore, I look forward to it being dealt with expeditiously through the committee stage.</text>
          <text id="20100916f85fa57c53d0434580000067">Bill read a second time and taken through its remaining stages.</text>
        </talker>
      </subproceeding>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>