<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2010-09-15" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="815" />
  <endPage num="861" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Residential Energy Efficiency Scheme</name>
      <text id="201009154b02d01ba81747d590000039">
        <heading>RESIDENTIAL ENERGY EFFICIENCY SCHEME</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="2742" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2010-09-15">
            <name>RESIDENTIAL ENERGY EFFICIENCY SCHEME</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2010-09-15T14:28:00" />
        <text id="201009154b02d01ba81747d590000040">
          <timeStamp time="2010-09-15T14:28:00" />
          <by role="member" id="2742">The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK (14:28):</by>  I seek leave to make an explanation before directing a question to the Minister for Consumer Affairs on the subject of the Residential Energy Efficiency Scheme (REES) and OCBA's investigations.</text>
        <text id="201009154b02d01ba81747d590000041">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="2742" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201009154b02d01ba81747d590000042">
          <by role="member" id="2742">The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK:</by>  Earlier this year I asked a question of the minister on 11 May in relation to the robustness of licensing and regulation of building contractors involved in the federal home insulation bungle. At that stage, the minister stated:</text>
        <text id="201009154b02d01ba81747d590000043">
          <inserted>OCBA commenced a fairly significant compliance campaign in July 2009...A number of them are under investigation.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="201009154b02d01ba81747d590000044">The minister also stated in that response that South Australia was in a very strong position because of our tighter regulation to monitor the installation of insulation in this state compared with other states.</text>
        <text id="201009154b02d01ba81747d590000045">My office and, clearly, <term>The Advertiser</term> newspaper have come across some dodgy practices within the REES scheme. It has been stated that OCBA needs to investigate some 1,000 homes believed to have been insulated with inappropriate products and that there are some homes that are also more vulnerable to fires due to installation by unlicensed and unqualified persons. My questions are:</text>
        <text id="201009154b02d01ba81747d590000046">1.&amp;#x9;Were any of those businesses and/or individuals the minister stated were under investigation relating to the home insulation scheme the same businesses and/or individuals that are now being investigated under the REES scheme?</text>
        <text id="201009154b02d01ba81747d590000047">2.&amp;#x9;Given that the large number of homes and homeowners who have been put into a very vulnerable position through REES, does the minister now consider that the regulation regime requires reform?</text>
        <text id="201009154b02d01ba81747d590000048">3.&amp;#x9;Given that ESCOSA has ruled out taking any action, can the minister guarantee that some compliance penalties will be attempted to be applied against energy retailers and/or their contractors?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for State/Local Government Relations, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Consumer Affairs, Minister for Government Enterprises, Minister for the City of Adelaide</electorate>
        <startTime time="2010-09-15T14:30:00" />
        <text id="201009154b02d01ba81747d590000049">
          <timeStamp time="2010-09-15T14:30:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO (Minister for State/Local Government Relations, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Consumer Affairs, Minister for Government Enterprises, Minister for the City of Adelaide) (14:30):</by>  I thank the honourable member for her important questions. In terms of the REES scheme, which commenced on 1 January 2009 and was administered by the Essential Services Commission of South Australia (ESCOSA), under that scheme, electricity and gas retailers and their contractors offer incentives, as we know, to adopt energy saving measures, including lowering showerheads, draft proofing and also installation of insulation. The scheme obviously aims to reduce power bills and greenhouse gas emissions, and it has a particular focus on low income families, who are obviously the most vulnerable to the costs of energy.</text>
        <page num="818" />
        <text id="201009154b02d01ba81747d590000050">ESCOSA undertook an audit of the REES and found that approximately 1,250 homes had insulation installed by a small number of unlicensed or incorrectly licensed companies. I am advised that all of the companies became appropriately licensed in 2009. I am further advised that, of the 1,250 households, only 51 had insulation installed without a qualified and licensed supervisor present. So, they are obviously the households that were of most concern to us.</text>
        <text id="201009154b02d01ba81747d590000051">Safety checks have been undertaken on 30 of these 51 householders, I have been advised. Both electricity and gas retailers and OCBA are endeavouring to contact the remaining 21 households. I have been advised that, of those, some have indicated that they don't wish to be audited; others have simply not responded to the correspondence that has been left for them. I understand that, where possible, emails have been sent. I am also advised that, where possible, doorknocking has also occurred. My advice is that quite significant attempts have been made to contact those 21 households.</text>
        <text id="201009154b02d01ba81747d590000052">I would like to take this opportunity to remind members that, if anyone has concerns about the safety of their insulation, they obviously should make sure they have a licensed electrician come out to check that insulation, and they should contact the Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency if the insulation was installed as part of the federal government's home insulation program. OCBA will continue to work with ESCOSA to ensure that only appropriately qualified and licensed contractors participate in that REES scheme. In terms of the specific question the honourable member asked me about the overlap of householders, I would need to take that part of the question on notice and bring back a response.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>