<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2010-09-15" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="815" />
  <endPage num="861" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Police Attendance Procedure</name>
      <text id="20100915964e5fe3ac8e410990000036">
        <heading>POLICE ATTENDANCE PROCEDURE</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1820" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Leader of the Opposition</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2010-09-15">
            <name>POLICE ATTENDANCE PROCEDURE</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2010-09-15T14:27:00" />
        <text id="20100915964e5fe3ac8e410990000037">
          <timeStamp time="2010-09-15T14:27:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1820">The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY (Leader of the Opposition) (14:27):</by>  A supplementary question: will the minister take my questions to the Minister for Police and bring back an answer, rather than trying to fob it off in this pathetic manner?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning, Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister Assisting the Premier in Public Sector Management</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2010-09-15">
            <name>POLICE ATTENDANCE PROCEDURE</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2010-09-15T14:27:00" />
        <page num="817" />
        <text id="20100915964e5fe3ac8e410990000038">
          <timeStamp time="2010-09-15T14:27:00" />
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY (Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning, Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister Assisting the Premier in Public Sector Management) (14:27):</by>  I am quite happy to do that, but I can imagine what the answer will be from the Minister for Police; it will be, 'Read my statement.' Not only is there an investigation into that matter going on but also, in addition to that, I understand from the media, arrests have been made and there may well be matters relevant to subsequent trials. The contents of such matters might well be subject to those proceedings, so I think the sensible thing for members to do—and I know most people in this house are sensible—will be to await the investigation. It is appropriate that there is an investigation; the minister is doing his job in that respect; and when we get the investigation, as I said, it will clarify what the current policies are and, if there are deficiencies, how they could be rectified.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>