<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2010-09-15" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="815" />
  <endPage num="861" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <text id="20100915eba6cfaa6da1463cb0000020">
      <heading>Question Time</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Police Attendance Procedure</name>
      <text id="20100915eba6cfaa6da1463cb0000021">
        <heading>POLICE ATTENDANCE PROCEDURE</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1820" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Leader of the Opposition</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2010-09-15">
            <name>POLICE ATTENDANCE PROCEDURE</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2010-09-15T14:22:00" />
        <text id="20100915eba6cfaa6da1463cb0000022">
          <timeStamp time="2010-09-15T14:22:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1820">The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY (Leader of the Opposition) (14:22): </by> I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking the Minister for Urban Development and Planning, representing the Minister for Police, a question in relation to the murder at Callington.</text>
        <text id="20100915eba6cfaa6da1463cb0000023">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1820" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <page num="816" />
        <text id="20100915eba6cfaa6da1463cb0000024">
          <by role="member" id="1820">The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY: </by> As members would be well aware, on the weekend a woman was bashed to death inside her home at Callington. At the time of calling the 131444 number, a glass pane on her back door had been smashed, but there was supposedly no offender on the property. The call taker made the decision to take an incident report, but did not pass the call on to the communications centre of SAPOL for possible dispatch. Some time later her body was found in the home.</text>
        <text id="20100915eba6cfaa6da1463cb0000025">I have since spoken to an employee within SAPOL communications branch. I am told that there is an unwritten policy that a patrol will not be dispatched unless an offender is on the property of the caller. I am told that there is no written policy which states the circumstances in which the details of the call should be passed on to a supervisor. I am informed that these two points have led to a mentality in call centres where the call taker will usually not bother passing on the details of a call unless an offender is allegedly present. My questions to the minister are:</text>
        <text id="20100915eba6cfaa6da1463cb0000026">1.&amp;#x9;Is there a policy that generally outlines the circumstances in which a caller in the SAPOL communications branch should relay the details of the call to their supervisor?</text>
        <text id="20100915eba6cfaa6da1463cb0000027">2.&amp;#x9;Is there a policy, written or otherwise, which states that dispatch will occur only if an offender is present on the caller's property?</text>
        <text id="20100915eba6cfaa6da1463cb0000028">3.&amp;#x9;How can a caller be aware of the proximity of an offender in circumstances such as it being 12.35am, being dark outside her house, with the caller inside the home unable to observe the property externally, such as was the case with this tragic event in Callington?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning, Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister Assisting the Premier in Public Sector Management</electorate>
        <startTime time="2010-09-15T14:24:00" />
        <text id="20100915eba6cfaa6da1463cb0000029">
          <timeStamp time="2010-09-15T14:24:00" />
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY (Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning, Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister Assisting the Premier in Public Sector Management) (14:24):</by>  I just tabled a ministerial statement from the Minister for Police in relation to those events. Perhaps I should just, for the benefit of the council, read it out. It is a relatively brief statement, but it does indicate what action the government is taking in relation to that, and I think we should await that before we further speculate. For the benefit of the council, I will read the statement:</text>
        <text id="20100915eba6cfaa6da1463cb0000030">
          <inserted>Madam Speaker, yesterday I advised the house that a comprehensive review would be conducted into a call to the 131 444 police assistance line on September 11, when Ms Pirjo Kemppainen reported a rock throwing incident at her house in Callington. The call centre operator took a police incident report but did not refer the matter to the Police Communications Branch. I am advised that the Commissioner of Police has declared this matter a significant incident investigation; consequently, an investigation will be conducted to:</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20100915eba6cfaa6da1463cb0000031">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">
            <inserted>examine the handling of this matter at the call centre, including action taken in response to the call;</inserted>
          </item>
        </text>
        <text id="20100915eba6cfaa6da1463cb0000032">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">
            <inserted>review the relevant standard operating procedures, level of training and supervision for call centre operators; and</inserted>
          </item>
        </text>
        <text id="20100915eba6cfaa6da1463cb0000033">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">
            <inserted>advise on (i) deficiencies in the manner in which the call was handled; (ii) any matter which may have contributed to the way the call was handled; (iii) whether any changes to policy and procedures, training, supervision or any other matter, are needed.</inserted>
          </item>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="20100915eba6cfaa6da1463cb0000034">
          <inserted>The Commissioner of Police has also requested Ms Sarah Bolt, head of the Police Complaints Authority, to independently review the conduct of the investigation, and its conclusions and recommendations. The independent Police Complaints Authority has agreed to the Commissioner's request. The Commissioner has acknowledged that police should have attended at Callington. It is now important that SAPOL immediately assess its internal processes and ensures all staff have a clear understanding of their responsibilities when receiving a call that may impact upon the safety of a person. The police investigation, and its outcomes, will be independently reviewed. It is expected the investigation will be completed within a short period.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="20100915eba6cfaa6da1463cb0000035">I think the relevant part of that statement by the minister is that an investigation will be conducted to review the relevant standard operating procedures and the handling of the matter. We would all be advised to await the outcome of that report which, as the minister says, is expected to be completed within a short period of time; and then, if there are any lessons that come from that or if there are deficiencies in the procedures, I am sure that all will be revealed in the outcome of this investigation.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>