<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2010-09-14" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="761" />
  <endPage num="816" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Royal Adelaide Show</name>
      <text id="20100914303ce6073c83472380000308">
        <heading>ROYAL ADELAIDE SHOW</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3125" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. R.P. WORTLEY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2010-09-14">
            <name>ROYAL ADELAIDE SHOW</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2010-09-14T15:12:00" />
        <page num="775" />
        <text id="20100914303ce6073c83472380000309">
          <timeStamp time="2010-09-14T15:12:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3125">The Hon. R.P. WORTLEY (15:12):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking the Minister for Consumer Affairs a question about the Royal Adelaide Show.</text>
        <text id="20100914303ce6073c83472380000310">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3125" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. R.P. WORTLEY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20100914303ce6073c83472380000311">
          <by role="member" id="3125">The Hon. R.P. WORTLEY:</by>  The Royal Adelaide Show ran this year from 3 to 11 September, and I understand that it was a great success in spite of the sometimes rainy conditions. Will the minister inform the chamber—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="599" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. J.S.L. Dawkins</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20100914303ce6073c83472380000312">
          <by role="member" id="599">The Hon. J.S.L. Dawkins:</by>  Did you go, Russell?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3125" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. R.P. WORTLEY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20100914303ce6073c83472380000313">
          <by role="member" id="3125">The Hon. R.P. WORTLEY:</by>  I did, yes. I had a great time. Will the minister inform the chamber of the Office of Consumer and Business Affairs, compliance activities at this year's show?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for State/Local Government Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Status of Women</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Consumer Affairs</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Government Enterprises</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the City of Adelaide</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2010-09-14T15:13:00" />
        <text id="20100914303ce6073c83472380000314">
          <timeStamp time="2010-09-14T15:13:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO (Minister for State/Local Government Relations, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Consumer Affairs, Minister for Government Enterprises, Minister for the City of Adelaide) (15:13):</by>  I thank the honourable member for his very important question, which does go to the very serious issue of safety, particularly the safety of our children. We all know how much our children love going to the show and how much they enjoy the show bags in particular, as well as the other novelty items available at the show. I believe it is, in fact, quite a serious issue.</text>
        <text id="20100914303ce6073c83472380000315">This was one of the few years that I did not make it to the show, and it was not because of the inclement weather. However, I am pleased to inform the chamber that OCBA safety inspectors were out there. As members might be aware, OCBA product safety officers inspect all show bags prior to the opening of the Royal Adelaide Show each year. This is a preventive measure to ensure that novelty items and toys are safe and comply with safety standards before they actually go on sale.</text>
        <text id="20100914303ce6073c83472380000316">This year, a total of 303 show bags were presented for examination on 10 August 2010 at the Adelaide Showgrounds and, of these, 94 required no further examination because they were food or only contained items such as magazines. Of the remaining 209 bags, officers examined or tested a total of 889 items. Five items were identified as having safety concerns. This was followed up with the suppliers, who all agreed to either amend or remove the items from the show bags.</text>
        <text id="20100914303ce6073c83472380000317">In addition to the show bag testing, OCBA also monitored sideshows and stalls to ensure that products supplied to consumers complied with relevant safety and information standards. Unfortunately, inspectors did find products which failed to meet safety standard labelling requirements. These items included baby nightwear and sunglasses. I am advised that OCBA officers detected baby jumpsuits for sale at two stalls at the show which did not comply with the mandatory safety standard for children's nightwear.</text>
        <text id="20100914303ce6073c83472380000318">Officers seized a jumpsuit from one stall and requested that the trader remove all other noncompliant clothing from sale. The trader will be issued with a warning letter advising that further action may be taken if the trader cannot provide written assurance that steps will be taken to ensure that no further breaches will occur. The owner of the second stall was selling jumpsuits with a warning label, but the labels were not secured in the correct position. Officers requested that these garments be removed from sale.</text>
        <text id="20100914303ce6073c83472380000319">Officers also detected sunglasses for sale which did not meet safety standards for sunglasses. The standard requires that these items must be labelled to indicate the lens category and have a description of the lens category, including a warning if they are not to be used for driving. The trader was required to remove the noncompliant goods from sale. </text>
        <text id="20100914303ce6073c83472380000320">Maximum penalties for a breach of a mandatory safety standard under the Trade Standards Act 1979 is $10,000 or a $315 expiation fine for less serious breaches. OCBA compliance officers also inspected 57 stalls at the Exhibition Hall and also sideshow alley, focusing on illegal refund signs, two-priced advertising and misleading representations concerning the quality of jewellery and clothing. As members would appreciate, it is a fairly expensive outing for a family to go to the show. Consumers need to know that they are getting value for money and are not being ripped off by some of these exhibits.</text>
        <page num="776" />
        <text id="20100914303ce6073c83472380000321">I am advised that overall compliance was good and that OCBA is following up one possible breach of the Building Work Contractors Act concerning an unlicensed building work contractor. I would certainly like to commend OCBA officers for their hard work in helping to ensure that South Australians can enjoy a safe and memorable Royal Adelaide Show. I have been approached by many members of the public who have offered to assist me next year by helping to inspect show bags and other items.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>