<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2010-07-21" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="625" />
  <endPage num="707" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Liquor Licensing</name>
      <text id="20100721179247ddf0b348c3a0000088">
        <heading>LIQUOR LICENSING</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3164" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2010-07-21">
            <name>LIQUOR LICENSING</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2010-07-21T14:55:00" />
        <text id="20100721179247ddf0b348c3a0000089">
          <timeStamp time="2010-07-21T14:55:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. WADE (14:55): </by> I would like to clarify that the minister is telling us that the cost to the state is $1 billion in social costs, but her concluding remarks—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. Gago</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20100721179247ddf0b348c3a0000090">
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. Gago: </by> A billion.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3164" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20100721179247ddf0b348c3a0000091">
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. WADE: </by> —yes, a billion—suggested that not a cent of that was going to address the social cost of abuse and that it was all going into compliance and enforcement. Is the government more concerned about its own expenditure than the needs of the community?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for State/Local Government Relations, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Consumer Affairs, Minister for Government Enterprises, Minister for the City of Adelaide</electorate>
        <startTime time="2010-07-21T14:55:00" />
        <text id="20100721179247ddf0b348c3a0000092">
          <timeStamp time="2010-07-21T14:55:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO (Minister for State/Local Government Relations, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Consumer Affairs, Minister for Government Enterprises, Minister for the City of Adelaide) (14:55): </by> He is outrageous, Mr President, and that is the scurrilous, mischievous scaremongering that I was talking about.</text>
        <page num="631" />
        <text id="20100721179247ddf0b348c3a0000093">In terms of the costs that I talked about—the costs of alcohol misuse to the community—it is $15.3 billion across Australia and the South Australian share of that is around $1 billion, not $1 million or whatever the honourable member misquoted.</text>
        <text id="20100721179247ddf0b348c3a0000094">The response that I was giving was in relation to the industry sector saying that the contribution it makes in terms of taxes already covers the cost of alcohol. I was using those figures to quite clearly demonstrate that that is not true. They do not cover the cost of alcohol. This state contributes enormous amounts into the wide elements of alcohol misuse, which covers things such as violence, court costs, health costs, premature death and the productivity loss associated with alcohol misuse. Already this state contributes large amounts right across those areas.</text>
        <text id="20100721179247ddf0b348c3a0000095">What we are saying, what I am proposing here, is a series of new measures, legislative and non-regulatory measures. I am saying there is no point putting in place new provisions unless we are prepared to police it and enforce it. Thus, we are looking at an enforcement, regulatory and compliance cost recovery system in terms of the liquor licensing components.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>