<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2010-07-20" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="577" />
  <endPage num="626" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Bills</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Controlled Substances (Miscellaneous) Amendment Bill</name>
      <text id="2010072034be8946acf74553b0000796">
        <heading>CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES (MISCELLANEOUS) AMENDMENT BILL</heading>
      </text>
      <subproceeding>
        <name>Introduction and First Reading</name>
        <text id="2010072034be8946acf74553b0000797">
          <heading>Introduction and First Reading</heading>
        </text>
        <text id="2010072034be8946acf74553b0000798">Received from the House of Assembly and read a first time.</text>
      </subproceeding>
      <subproceeding>
        <name>Second Reading</name>
        <text id="2010072034be8946acf74553b0000799">
          <heading>Second Reading</heading>
        </text>
        <talker role="member" id="574" kind="speech">
          <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
          <house>Legislative Council</house>
          <electorate id="">Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning, Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister Assisting the Premier in Public Sector Management</electorate>
          <startTime time="2010-07-20T17:58:00" />
          <text id="2010072034be8946acf74553b0000800">
            <timeStamp time="2010-07-20T17:58:00" />
            <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY (Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning, Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister Assisting the Premier in Public Sector Management) (17:58): </by> I move:</text>
          <text id="2010072034be8946acf74553b0000801">
            <inserted>That this bill be now read a second time.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text continued="true" id="2010072034be8946acf74553b0000802">I seek leave to have the second reading explanation inserted in <term>Hansard </term>without my reading it.</text>
          <text id="2010072034be8946acf74553b0000803">Leave granted.</text>
          <text id="2010072034be8946acf74553b0000804">
            <inserted>This Bill amends the <term>Controlled Substances Act 1984</term> to implement the 2010 Labor election commitment to create a new aggravated offence of trafficking controlled drugs in or around licensed premises and entertainment venues. It also contains some miscellaneous technical amendments to the Act.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text continued="true" id="2010072034be8946acf74553b0000805">
            <inserted>Trafficking in Licensed Premises</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="2010072034be8946acf74553b0000806">
            <inserted>The Bill amends section 32 of the <term>Controlled Substances Act</term> to introduce a new offence, that of trafficking in controlled drugs in a prescribed area. A prescribed area is defined to mean:</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="2010072034be8946acf74553b0000807">
            <inserted>(a)&amp;#x9;prescribed licensed premises or an area being used in connection with prescribed licensed premises; or</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="2010072034be8946acf74553b0000808">
            <inserted>(b)&amp;#x9;premises at which members of the public are gathered for a public entertainment or an area being used in connection with such premises.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="2010072034be8946acf74553b0000809">
            <inserted>The object of the new offence is to impose a higher maximum penalty (imprisonment for 15 years or $75 000 as opposed to imprisonment for 10 years or $50 000 for the basic offence) and as a result pose a greater deterrent to drug dealing in licensed premises and at entertainment events frequented by young people. At such premises and events the combination of alcohol, atmosphere (loud music, lighting) and peer pressure makes young people particularly vulnerable to criminals selling illegal drugs.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="2010072034be8946acf74553b0000810">
            <inserted>The new offence does not apply to trafficking in all licensed premises. The Government believes this would be too broad. The aim is to target the types of venues frequented by young people and, as a result, drug dealers-pubs, nightclubs, wine bars and the like. As such, the term prescribed licensed premises is defined to include premises in respect of which these types of liquor licenses are in force:</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="2010072034be8946acf74553b0000811">
            <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">
              <inserted>a hotel licence;</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <page num="625" />
          <text id="2010072034be8946acf74553b0000812">
            <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">
              <inserted>a restaurant licence that includes an extended trading authorisation;</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="2010072034be8946acf74553b0000813">
            <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">
              <inserted>an entertainment venue licence;</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="2010072034be8946acf74553b0000814">
            <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">
              <inserted>a club licence that includes an extended trading authorisation;</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="2010072034be8946acf74553b0000815">
            <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">
              <inserted>a special circumstances licence that includes an extended trading authorisation.</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="2010072034be8946acf74553b0000816">
            <inserted>The new offence also applies to the Adelaide Casino and there is scope to extend it to other types of licensed premises by regulation should the need to do so arise at some point in the future. Similarly, the definition of public entertainment event is limited to a dance, performance, exhibition or event that is calculated to attract and entertain members of the public. This will cover large outdoor concerts, such as the Big Day Out, and organised dance events (commonly referred to as raves, rave parties or dance parties) whether or not admission is restricted or open, and whether or not an admission charge is imposed or access is free. The reason for limiting the new offence in this way (rather than applying it to any public event) is two-fold:</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="2010072034be8946acf74553b0000817">
            <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">
              <inserted>these are the types of events at which young people and drug dealers mix; and,</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="2010072034be8946acf74553b0000818">
            <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">
              <inserted>such events are those at which the police may use their special drug detection powers under the Act.</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="2010072034be8946acf74553b0000819">
            <inserted>The new offence will also apply to areas being used in connection with prescribed licensed premises and prescribed places of public entertainment, such as a car parking area specifically provided for the use of patrons of the premises and an area in which people are queuing to enter the premises. The Government is advised that such areas are often used by drug dealers to conduct business with patrons, out of sight of security staff.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text continued="true" id="2010072034be8946acf74553b0000820">
            <inserted>Miscellaneous Amendments</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="2010072034be8946acf74553b0000821">
            <inserted>The Bill contains two miscellaneous amendments to the <term>Controlled Substances Act</term>.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="2010072034be8946acf74553b0000822">
            <inserted>The first is an amendment to the definition of 'discrete dosage unit' to delete the ability to prescribe amounts for discrete dosage units by regulation. This is being done because it is not thought that there will ever be an occasion where it would be wise to exercise such a power.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="2010072034be8946acf74553b0000823">
            <inserted>The second amendment is to give an analyst the power to certify that an analysed substance is an analogue of a controlled substance and to certify as to its weight, amount or quantity. The certificate shifts the onus of proof to the defendant. It is open to the defendant to disprove those matters certified.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="2010072034be8946acf74553b0000824">
            <inserted>I commend the Bill to Members.</inserted>
          </text>
          <bookmark>Explanation of Clauses</bookmark>
          <text id="2010072034be8946acf74553b0000825">
            <inserted>
              <subheading>Explanation of Clauses</subheading>
            </inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="2010072034be8946acf74553b0000826">
            <item>
              <inserted>Part 1—Preliminary</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="2010072034be8946acf74553b0000827">
            <item>
              <inserted>1—Short title</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="2010072034be8946acf74553b0000828">
            <item>
              <inserted>2—Commencement</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="2010072034be8946acf74553b0000829">
            <item>
              <inserted>3—Amendment provisions</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="2010072034be8946acf74553b0000830">
            <inserted>These clauses are formal.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="2010072034be8946acf74553b0000831">
            <item>
              <inserted>Part 2—Amendment of <term>Controlled Substances Act 1984</term></inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="2010072034be8946acf74553b0000832">
            <item>
              <inserted>4—Amendment of section 4—Interpretation</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="2010072034be8946acf74553b0000833">
            <inserted>This clause amends the definition of <term>discrete dosage unit</term> in the <term>Controlled Substances Act 1984</term> to remove the capacity to prescribe by regulation a maximum amount in relation to a controlled drug or controlled precursor contained in a discrete dosage unit.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text continued="true" id="2010072034be8946acf74553b0000834">
            <inserted>5—Amendment of section 32—Trafficking</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="2010072034be8946acf74553b0000835">
            <inserted>This clause amends section 32 to provide a new specific offence of trafficking in a controlled drug (other than any form of cannabis) in a prescribed area.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text continued="true" id="2010072034be8946acf74553b0000836">
            <inserted>6—Amendment of section 53—Analysis</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="2010072034be8946acf74553b0000837">
            <inserted>This clause makes it clear that an analysis may include a determination as to the weight, amount or quantity of any substance and allows the regulations to make provision in relation to such a determination. The clause also deletes an obsolete reference to a botanist.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text continued="true" id="2010072034be8946acf74553b0000838">
            <inserted>7—Amendment of section 61—Evidentiary provisions</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="2010072034be8946acf74553b0000839">
            <inserted>This clause amends the evidentiary provisions to make it clear that evidentiary certificates can identify a substance as an analogue of another substance and may certify as to the weight, amount or quantity of the substance analysed.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="2010072034be8946acf74553b0000840" />
          <text id="2010072034be8946acf74553b0000841">Debate adjourned on motion of Hon. D.W. Ridgway.</text>
        </talker>
      </subproceeding>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>