<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2010-07-20" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="577" />
  <endPage num="626" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>WorkCover Corporation</name>
      <text id="2010072073d42095e93d4f44b0000259">
        <heading>WORKCOVER CORPORATION</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2010-07-20">
            <name>WORKCOVER CORPORATION</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2010-07-20T15:26:00" />
        <text id="2010072073d42095e93d4f44b0000260">
          <timeStamp time="2010-07-20T15:26:00" />
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (15:26):</by>  I have a supplementary question arising out of the answer.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1704">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="2010072073d42095e93d4f44b0000261">
          <by role="member" id="1704">The PRESIDENT:</by>  Which answer?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="2010072073d42095e93d4f44b0000262">
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS:</by>  That answer. Can the minister indicate why he believes that discussion he had with the chief executive officer was not a formal briefing in relation to the unfunded liability?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning, Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister Assisting the Premier in Public Sector Management</electorate>
        <startTime time="2010-07-20T15:27:00" />
        <text id="2010072073d42095e93d4f44b0000263">
          <timeStamp time="2010-07-20T15:27:00" />
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY (Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning, Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister Assisting the Premier in Public Sector Management) (15:27):</by>  I would have thought it was pretty obvious. If you get a detailed report, particularly a written report, setting out what the actual figure might be, then that would be a formal briefing. If you just have a discussion about what may impact upon the actual figure, that is another matter. In any case I would expect that the board of WorkCover will be formally notified before I would get that briefing. I have discussions with the chief executive of WorkCover, as I do with other agencies, and we discussed a whole range of matters. I do not know the actual figure; I have not yet been provided with that.</text>
        <text id="2010072073d42095e93d4f44b0000264">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="55">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1704">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="2010072073d42095e93d4f44b0000265">
          <by role="member" id="1704">The PRESIDENT:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>