<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2010-06-30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="499" />
  <endPage num="554" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Olympic Dam</name>
      <text id="20100630494d512075d545ecb0000380">
        <heading>OLYMPIC DAM</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3130" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. M. PARNELL</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2010-06-30">
            <name>OLYMPIC DAM</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2010-06-30T15:05:00" />
        <text id="20100630494d512075d545ecb0000381">
          <timeStamp time="2010-06-30T15:05:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3130">The Hon. M. PARNELL (15:05):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking the Minister for State/Local Government Relations, representing the Minister for Environment and Conservation, a question about radiation exposure of workers at Olympic Dam.</text>
        <text id="20100630494d512075d545ecb0000382">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3130" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. M. PARNELL</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20100630494d512075d545ecb0000383">
          <by role="member" id="3130">The Hon. M. PARNELL:</by>  I received an email recently from a person who worked as a subcontractor underground at the Olympic Dam mine. In his email to me, this worker says:</text>
        <page num="524" />
        <text id="20100630494d512075d545ecb0000384">
          <inserted>I was aware of radiation monitoring equipment that other staff were issued but for the 13 months that I worked there I was not issued with one. I never questioned the reason why but after I had finished working there I discovered that I should have in fact been issued with one. It was when I was applying for another mining job that in the application it asked about previous radiation exposure and the levels. I can't remember who I spoke to, I think a friend who used to work at Olympic Dam, but I found out that all underground employees should have been issued with this monitoring device.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20100630494d512075d545ecb0000385">
          <inserted>I then asked SafeWork SA about this. They said it had nothing to do with them and referred me to the EPA. I found it interesting that SafeWork SA didn't have any control over this as it is effectively a safety item. The EPA advised me that I should have been issued one. The EPA followed it up with BHP Billiton and after a couple of weeks, I received a report in the mail showing my exposure levels. I thought it was interesting as I wasn't issued with a monitoring device, and there were no accurate records kept of my time underground, so the information supplied could not have been accurate.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20100630494d512075d545ecb0000386">
          <inserted>I am happy to speak with you further on this if it helps you with your push to make the companies up there more accountable for the safety of the employees.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="20100630494d512075d545ecb0000387">I spoke to this worker this morning, and he has agreed that I can pass on his name and contact details to the minister to assist in verifying his particular account. However, the issues raised are of general concern and may relate to other workers. My questions are:</text>
        <text id="20100630494d512075d545ecb0000388">1.&amp;#x9;Can the minister confirm that all underground workers at the Olympic Dam mine, whether employed by BHP Billiton or subcontractors, are required to be issued with radiation monitoring devices?</text>
        <text id="20100630494d512075d545ecb0000389">2.&amp;#x9;If that is the case, how does the EPA verify and enforce this requirement?</text>
        <text id="20100630494d512075d545ecb0000390">3.&amp;#x9;Is it the EPA's practice to issue radiation exposure reports to workers, based on information other than personal radiation monitoring devices. If so, on what basis are such reports issued?</text>
        <text id="20100630494d512075d545ecb0000391">4.&amp;#x9;How are radiation levels monitored and reported to the EPA and how does the EPA verify the completeness and accuracy of these reports?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for State/Local Government Relations, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Consumer Affairs, Minister for Government Enterprises, Minister for the City of Adelaide</electorate>
        <startTime time="2010-06-30T15:08:00" />
        <text id="20100630494d512075d545ecb0000392">
          <timeStamp time="2010-06-30T15:08:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO (Minister for State/Local Government Relations, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Consumer Affairs, Minister for Government Enterprises, Minister for the City of Adelaide) (15:08):</by>  I thank the honourable member for his important questions. I will refer his questions to the Minister for Environment and Conservation in another place and bring back a response.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>