<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2010-06-29" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="455" />
  <endPage num="499" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Answers to Questions</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Copper Coast District Council</name>
      <text id="20100629e72bd4d88ebc46c0a0000264">
        <heading>COPPER COAST DISTRICT COUNCIL</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3130" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. M. PARNELL</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2010-06-29">
            <name>COPPER COAST DISTRICT COUNCIL</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="20100629e72bd4d88ebc46c0a0000265">In reply to <by role="member" id="3130">the Hon. M. PARNELL</by> (27 May 2010).</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning, Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister Assisting the Premier in Public Sector Management</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2010-06-29">
            <name>COPPER COAST DISTRICT COUNCIL</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="20100629e72bd4d88ebc46c0a0000266">
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY (Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning, Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister Assisting the Premier in Public Sector Management):</by>  I have been provided the following information:</text>
        <text id="20100629e72bd4d88ebc46c0a0000267">I can confirm that the District Council of Copper Coast has adopted a setback of 5.0 metres for detached dwellings for 'The Dunes' development, Port Hughes along with other development controls relating to protrusions, porticos, bay windows, verandas, porches and landscaping. </text>
        <text id="20100629e72bd4d88ebc46c0a0000268">The setbacks which applied previously included an 8.0 metre setback for double storey dwellings and 6.0 metre setback for single storey detached dwellings Other controls which continue to apply include design guidelines and an encumbrance.</text>
        <text id="20100629e72bd4d88ebc46c0a0000269">Council's Environment Advisory Committee considered a Report from Connor Holmes, Development Consultants and an Officer's report at its meeting held on 26 May 2010. The consultants had been engaged to undertake a review of the subdivision design and the planning controls to assist in meeting market demands. Feedback from builders, developers and purchasers suggested the subdivision allotment sizes were not large enough to accommodate the popular or common building designs. </text>
        <text id="20100629e72bd4d88ebc46c0a0000270">The setback controls applying in a number of other Council areas were considered by Council as part of the investigations and similar setback controls have now been adopted by the Council.</text>
        <text id="20100629e72bd4d88ebc46c0a0000271">Council officers have the authority to approve development with reduced setbacks provided the development is not seriously at variance with the Development Plan, provided the development on balance meets the relevant provisions of the Development Plan and each application is assessed on its individual merits.</text>
        <text id="20100629e72bd4d88ebc46c0a0000272">Compliance with setbacks is not a mandatory requirement for development applications; rather it is one matter to be taken into consideration by Council along with all other relevant Development Plan provisions.</text>
        <text id="20100629e72bd4d88ebc46c0a0000273">There is no justification for removing the Council's statutory development responsibilities and placing them with the Development Assessment Commission.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>