<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2010-06-24" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="405" />
  <endPage num="456" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Samuell, Dr D.</name>
      <text id="20100624ea7a0bfb5ba1458380000299">
        <heading>SAMUELL, DR D.</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3128" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. A. BRESSINGTON</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2010-06-24">
            <name>SAMUELL, DR D.</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2010-06-24T14:54:00" />
        <text id="20100624ea7a0bfb5ba1458380000300">
          <timeStamp time="2010-06-24T14:54:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3128">The Hon. A. BRESSINGTON (14:54):</by>  I have a supplementary question. Will the minister also try to get a commitment from WorkCover, since they are so willing to change their policies, that they will also limit the number of independent medical examinations that an injured worker is required to undergo?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning, Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister Assisting the Premier in Public Sector Management</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2010-06-24">
            <name>SAMUELL, DR D.</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2010-06-24T14:54:00" />
        <text id="20100624ea7a0bfb5ba1458380000301">
          <timeStamp time="2010-06-24T14:54:00" />
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY (Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning, Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister Assisting the Premier in Public Sector Management) (14:54):</by>  The problem would be that if you do need an expert from interstate because the specialty is so narrow that there is only a handful of people here and that they may therefore be conflicted, because they have already seen the person or in some way they are not available, then it would be dangerous to put a limit on it.</text>
        <page num="430" />
        <text id="20100624ea7a0bfb5ba1458380000302">Obviously, I expect that WorkCover will adopt practices to reduce that. Certainly, the measures it has already announced will, I hope, see a reduction in the number of interstate medical examinations. That is the whole point of the exercise, and we would expect to see that happen. Whether putting a cap on it is sensible is another matter but I would certainly expect to see the number of interstate independent medical examinations reduced. That is the whole purpose of the exercise.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>