<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2010-05-27" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="287" />
  <endPage num="306" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>WorkCover Corporation</name>
      <text id="2010052766d24f3df5a44afe80000113">
        <heading>WORKCOVER CORPORATION</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3128" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. A. BRESSINGTON</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2010-05-27">
            <name>WORKCOVER CORPORATION</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2010-05-27T15:00:00" />
        <text id="2010052766d24f3df5a44afe80000114">
          <timeStamp time="2010-05-27T15:00:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3128">The Hon. A. BRESSINGTON (15:00):</by>  I have a supplementary question arising from the last answer.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1704">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="2010052766d24f3df5a44afe80000115">
          <by role="member" id="1704">The PRESIDENT:</by>  Just be careful with it.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3128">
        <name>The Hon. A. BRESSINGTON</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="2010052766d24f3df5a44afe80000116">
          <by role="member" id="3128">The Hon. A. BRESSINGTON:</by>  Will the minister confirm that it has now cost WorkCover Corporation some $4 million for fly-in IMEs who, according to the legal profession, are very pro WorkCover, rather than using the medical examiners we already have in South Australia?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning, Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister Assisting the Premier in Public Sector Management</electorate>
        <startTime time="2010-05-27T15:00:00" />
        <text id="2010052766d24f3df5a44afe80000117">
          <timeStamp time="2010-05-27T15:00:00" />
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY (Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning, Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister Assisting the Premier in Public Sector Management) (15:00):</by>  I will see what information can be provided in relation to the cost of medical panels. However, it is very easy to use this inflammatory language. Where workers have been unable to return to work for reasons of workplace injury, particularly if it has been a longstanding injury, one can understand why they become frustrated with that situation—I think anyone in that situation would become frustrated—and it is easy to make accusations about biases these panels might have. We have to ensure that those panels act in a fair way. I am sure the vast majority of injured workers do not rort the system; unfortunately, we know that there is a small proportion who do, and that is why any scheme needs protection. I do not accept the accusation that panels are necessarily unfair, but these are all matters which will be—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3128" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. A. Bressington</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="2010052766d24f3df5a44afe80000118">
          <by role="member" id="3128">The Hon. A. Bressington:</by>  Fly-ins, the IMEs are flown in at a cost of $4 million.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="2010052766d24f3df5a44afe80000119">
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY:</by>  I will check that information and bring back a response for the honourable member.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>